Head Tracking with Cliffs of Dover

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

'Round and 'round and 'round it goes... does anyone read a thread through? god only knows.



If you want inclusion, it would be well worth (you possibly with programming your skills?) to offer up a properly working and fully supported alternative that respects the rights (and wishes) of other developers to protect their product, and present it in a professional manner. Its not that hard is it??

Whilst outrageous claims against and the bashing of companies continues, why should anyone take you (collective) or your product seriously?

A lot of crap.

I posted in this forum the way to any use FreeTrackClient.dll to get data from Freetrack Interface and use it right now in any aplication with 6DOF HT in mind.

And this guy keep talking about some "professional manner"... Go to hell.

The "professional manner" maybe is the NP manner: devs can't even TALK about their "contracts" with NP.

Pathetic.

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

A lot of crap.

I posted in this forum the way to any use FreeTrackClient.dll to get data from Freetrack Interface and use it right now in any aplication with 6DOF HT in mind.

And this guy keep talking about some "professional manner"... Go to hell.

The "professional manner" maybe is the NP manner: devs can't even TALK about their "contracts" with NP.

Pathetic.

and you wonder why there are problems with inclusion

[albx]

LoBiSoMeM you are feeding a troll, so I did also... my fault...

[Wolf_Rider]

I'm certain then, you don't know what freedom is albx

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by albx

LoBiSoMeM you are feeding a troll, so I did also... my fault...

This troll need a lot of food, because he's so weak and skinny...

But I believe he's not a troll, maybe some kind of internet robot, because keep typing the same things over and over again...

[robtek]

Lobi and albx,

you must be feeling really vulnerable to start calling names again.
But it would be so easy, if FT wasn't able to use any NP - software, be it a cracked or genuine dll, this whole discussion would have been cut short.
But FT is able to use those dll's, and some users use this shortcut even with the available and usable freetrack.dll.
So, if you would just accept that there are users who use freetrack to infringe on NP software even if its not needed, there might be a understanding.

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by robtek

Lobi and albx,

you must be feeling really vulnerable to start calling names again.
But it would be so easy, if FT wasn't able to use any NP - software, be it a cracked or genuine dll, this whole discussion would have been cut short.
But FT is able to use those dll's, and some users use this shortcut even with the available and usable freetrack.dll.
So, if you would just accept that there are users who use freetrack to infringe on NP software even if its not needed, there might be a understanding.

NONONONONONONO!

I'm amazed how people don't understand how things work!

Freetrack uses the "NP route" because the GAMES USES THAT ROUTE, NOT FREETRACK ROUTE!

Man, think a minute... We Freetrack users don't want to "hack" the "nothing" of NP. Freetrack neither. But the majority of game devs just provide access to NP inteface ONLY!

Isn't hard to understand that! If games uses FreeTrackClient.dll to use Freetrack inteface, nobody will using Freetrack will use the "NP route". I never will use "NP route" in a geme with suport to Freetrack Interface. Freetrack Interface odes exactly the same thing, by God sake!

If Freetrack don't have NOW the "NP route", I'm now will be flying IL-2 without head tracking! Isn't a "shortcut" for me, it's THE ONLY WAY!!!

If Oleg uses Freetrack Interface, I'll tick Freetrack Interface in Freetrack!

Freetrack ellimination of the "NP route" is easy, NP can achieve it now! You know how?

- Allowing game devs to use either HT solutions and interfaces!

But you believe that NP want's that?!?!?!?!?!?!

Let's begin to think just a little?!?!??!

[robtek]

So finally you are speaking the truth, great.

As long as the game-devs dont use the freetrack.dll you don't care about pirating NP products.
You still failed to proof, as i knew that you couldn't, that NP influences the game-devs.
So your whole tower of depending opinions has crashed.