Freetrack interface use in IL-2:CoD

[SEE]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

It is a completely different poll as determined by its criteria, not a poll for the inclusion of alternative headtrackers per se.

Urm?.....never said it was! But the vote shows some interesting data none the less regards 'system' usage and I am sure that everyone with 'headtracking' has an opinion as to its inclusion in Stock. Simply pointing out that they can express/vote ref 6DOF in stock- just in case they missed that thread you understand. But of course, little bits of 'other' data can also be gleaned.........

But me thinks you don't like one particular set of results from the headtracking community of a different forum, no suprises there W-R!

[robtek]

There is also a offspring poll here:
http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/t...3/m/2051024119
where one can see that TIR vs FT equals about 10 to 1.

[Wolf_Rider]

my reference was to the poll Puma raised, which you pointed out...

Originally Posted by SEE

In case you are unaware, vote in 'Mysticpumas' IL2forum Poll (link in his opening post) for the inclusion of 6DOF in Stock. Not directly about FT v TIR but the poll includes use of 'alternatives' to TIR.

whereas you may also be trying to be refer to Bearcat's survey on the UBI forum.


The thing you seem to be not aware of See, is no-one really is against the inclusion of alternative headtracking... this has been the consensus since very early in the piece.
Its the way some alternative headtracking go about what they do, which is the problem.

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

Its the way some alternative headtracking go about what they do, which is the problem.

He's a deaf broken record. Amazing!

[Wolf_Rider]

and you wonder why there are problems with inclusion...

[norulz]

I don't think it's amazing... rather pathetic. Only a direct interest in keeping the "face" of NP clean at all costs would go to such ridiculous extent of fighting obvious till bitter end.

What a pathetic way of earning your daily salami...

[Wolf_Rider]

I'm not the one fighting though

[SEE]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

The thing you seem to be not aware of See, is no-one really is against the inclusion of alternative headtracking... this has been the consensus since very early in the piece.
Its the way some alternative headtracking go about what they do, which is the problem.

I totally agree W-R and that is an honest POV I share. I use FT mainly because it has hot keys to enable/disable any unwanted axis in flight and these are on my POV. I also have TIR but it doesn't have 6 axis hot key support. (I posted on the TIR forum and asked if it could be included at some point). This is why FT is my preferred choice and why it works well in IL2 + 6DOF.

I would like everyone to use their kit in CoD. But if not - then players will have to upgrade, find a work around, not buy CoD and complain to the Devs/publishers. If FT isn't included, there will be a reason. Wether that is made known, only time will tell.

[Wolf_Rider]

its nice when people see eye to eye, eh?


If a "workaround" can be achieved without infringement... great
If a need for certain features, or changes/ additions made, can be achieved by making a considered approach to the party concerned (ie working with them)... great

Threats of "not to buy" however, has become cliche.

[CharveL]

Just wanted to chime in and say nice job WR for keeping a logical and calm discussion against the wave of misplaced rabid fanboism.

I think the personal attacks on you do more to harm whatever convoluted rationalizations they're trying to make anyway but watching their meltdowns does have a rubbernecker kind of morbid appeal.