Daidalos Team's Room -QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS ONLY - For 4.11

[EJGr.Ost_Caspar]

Stealth Eagle... this is very old knowledge, but I see you are new here (welcome!), so I will explain: Our team has signed a contract with 1C to be able do what we do. Part of that contract are among other things following restrictions:

1. No implementing of things, that is owned in reallife by Northrop-Grumman (this is the place to go to, if you think you can help us - I hope you are a billionaire!)
2. No implementing of content, that may thematically interfer with the future plans of 1C, regarding their new flight sim - which excludes explicitly any Battle Of Britain content.

This is all a very fact and nothing can be done against it (especially not from our side).

[Stealth_Eagle]

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar

Stealth Eagle... this is very old knowledge, but I see you are new here (welcome!), so I will explain: Our team has signed a contract with 1C to be able do what we do. Part of that contract are among other things following restrictions:

1. No implementing of things, that is owned in reallife by Northrop-Grumman (this is the place to go to, if you think you can help us - I hope you are a billionaire!)
2. No implementing of content, that may thematically interfer with the future plans of 1C, regarding their new flight sim - which excludes explicitly any Battle Of Britain content.

This is all a very fact and nothing can be done against it (especially not from our side).

I am contacting Northtop Grumman and see if I can get this for your rights for it. Wish me luck.

Message has been sent and I have a copy of the message if needed.

[Grach]

First I'd like to thank TD for all their hard work and dedication in keeping Il-2/FB a very fine game with all this excellent new content.

Can you guys please check the armament of the H8K1 'Emily' if you have a moment?
Currently it seems to have a mix of MG-151/20 and MG-81(!)
I know that there are better simulators for IJN weapons as the G4M1 seems somewhat more acceptable in this manner... (MG-FF/M & .303 Browning?)

Toughening up the big (4 engine) bombers a bit might not go astray either.
I've been shooting down B-17(F&G)s in IAR-80 (4x rifle calibre mg) lately which shouldn't be that easy, surely??? Aim between the engines and even rcmg will light them up quite quickly. It is like they have no fuel tank protection at all.
I'm trying to replicate these results with IAR-80 vs Pe-8 but they seem harder to light up and of course 20mm ShVAK in the face is also a problem too!

Cheers!

[[URU]BlackFox]

- Having an option to see all icons in white (or the same color) when radar is active. Friend /Foe identification is just too detailed.

- A system that registers attacks on ships so that the kills for big ships can be shared.

- A Flyable Japanese torpedo bomber

- Possibility to select different formations for flights in FMB.

- Revised Ground Attack routine for attack/jabos/fighters. They make long turns before attacking and abandon the target before destroyed, even if they still have ammo.

- I know this is too much, but some kind of evasive maneuvers for ships would be great.

Just wishing. Thx for all.

[Pershing]

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar

...
2. No implementing of content, that may thematically interfer with the future plans of 1C, regarding their new flight sim - which excludes explicitly any Battle Of Britain content.
....

So, we can forget about light bombs? Or not?

[EJGr.Ost_Caspar]

Originally Posted by Pershing

So, we can forget about light bombs? Or not?

Not sure, what you mean (if you posted it already in this thread, just give me a link... I didn't read every page personally).

[Pershing]

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar

Not sure, what you mean (if you posted it already in this thread, just give me a link... I didn't read every page personally).

Oh, sorry) I meant "illuminating" or "flare" bombs. In ohter words - bombs for an illumitaing or a targets marking in night time. Not sure what is their right name in English. In German it sounds "Leuchtbombe", in russian "SAB" or "САБ" - "светящая авиационная бомба". See here - http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=161

[EJGr.Ost_Caspar]

Originally Posted by Pershing

Oh, sorry) I meant "illuminating" or "flare" bombs....

Well... we have flares with other planes too, so I see no reason, why it shouldn't be implemented (I suppose it was used during the whole war) - even more, if we are going to expand the nightfighting scenario.

I think, such general armament options aren't as critical as planes (regarding 1C and CoD).

[Zorin]

1. Can you create a Ju88 A-4 field mod.? That would mean th inclusion of the A-17 forward MG FF installation, exhaust covers and the upper rearward firing MGs siwtched for MG131s. Should give us a decent mid war version for the Eastern front.
2. Could the 300l and 900l fuel tanks be given to the Ju88 and He111 bombers?
3. Will the Beaufighter get a british torpedo or will the American MK13 stay?

P.S.: Please, also check the Ju88 Jumos for correct specifications. I do remember that there was something not quite correct with them.

[Tempest123]

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar

...even more, if we are going to expand the nightfighting scenario.

Yes, that would be awesome, those night missions are some of my faves.