Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-19-2011, 02:58 PM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MD_Titus View Post
ah right, but what about the change to the elevator trim, it does seem to take a lot more trim to maintain a level attitude at about 280-300kmh

the rest of the spit characteristics are fine imo, the aileron fix is appreciated and it seems... well, it seems to give more warning of a stall, and require flying properly. as this is the case, will "spitnoob" become a phrase of the past?!
A Spitfire V as tested by NACA went practically into stall with the elevator still depressed at about 4° (~25% of travel). It did a 3g turn at 170 mph with the elevator at about neutral. Think about that when you check in game behaviour.

The neutral trim point of the elevator trim can be set by the pilot in game, so I don't think it matters much. I just trim it down a lot on take off and then have more fun flying the thing than I ever had before.

Last edited by JtD; 02-19-2011 at 03:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-19-2011, 03:17 PM
PE_Tihi PE_Tihi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JtD View Post
A Spitfire V as tested by NACA went practically into stall with the elevator still depressed at about 4° (~25% of travel). It did a 3g turn at 170 mph with the elevator at about neutral. Think about that when you check in game behaviour.

The neutral trim point of the elevator trim can be set by the pilot in game, so I don't think it matters much. I just trim it down a lot on take off and then have more fun flying the thing than I ever had before.
I could not visit the only site I could find reporting on this NACA Spit test you quote-the browser forbids the site as unsafe.(ww2aircraft.net)

Could you find any such data on the heavy trimming necessary on the Spitfire, from a British source? Like the spitfireperformance site, for example?

Engineers have been known of mounting the things upside down on unfamiliar foreign equipment, you know.

Any trimming increases drag, reducing speed. Not irrelevent to a transport, you see.

Ahm, what's this:

' "It happened that Wright Field had the only Spitfire in America-a Mark V. Unfortunately almost every pilot in the Air Corps had had a go on her and like a car that had too many drivers, she was the worse for wear...'She was very tired, very sloppy-she'd had the guts caned out of her all right."


NACA got it for testing after that.'

http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtop...91603&start=15


Hmm? How about looking at the sources that say the things you may not like , too ?

Last edited by PE_Tihi; 02-19-2011 at 03:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-19-2011, 03:32 PM
MD_Titus MD_Titus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PE_Tihi View Post
I could not visit the only site I could find reporting on this NACA Spit test you quote-the browser forbids the site as unsafe.(ww2aircraft.net)

Could you find any such data on the heavy trimming necessary on the Spitfire, from a British source? Like the spitfireperformance site, for example?

Engineers have been known of mounting the things upside down on unfamiliar foreign equipment, you know.

Any trimming increases drag, reducing speed. Not irrelevent to a transport, you see.
this is incorrect. you use trim as it has a lesser drag penalty than using stick controls. a correctly trimmed plane should fly faster than the same plane being kept level using pilot input, no?

JtD - as for neutral trim point being settable in game, how would i go about doing this, or do you just mean dialing in trim for straight and level and that is the neutral point?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-19-2011, 03:51 PM
PE_Tihi PE_Tihi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MD_Titus View Post
this is incorrect. you use trim as it has a lesser drag penalty than using stick controls. a correctly trimmed plane should fly faster than the same plane being kept level using pilot input, no?

JtD - as for neutral trim point being settable in game, how would i go about doing this, or do you just mean dialing in trim for straight and level and that is the neutral point?
If you 'turn' the whole horizontal stabilizer plane to get the plane in trim for its 'most important' flight regime (certain airspeed), you get less drag at that speed than by deflecting the elevator by a trim tab, increasing the elevator airfoil chamber.

This is one reason for 'flying tails', too.

Accordingly, it would have been quite sloppy from Supermarine to deliver such a plane NACA is talking about. It would mean the drag in order to neutralize the wing-lift moment (trim drag) is higher than neccessary.

Last edited by PE_Tihi; 02-19-2011 at 11:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-20-2011, 07:10 AM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MD_Titus View Post
JtD - as for neutral trim point being settable in game, how would i go about doing this, or do you just mean dialing in trim for straight and level and that is the neutral point?
Yes, that's what I just mean. It was poor wording on my part, sorry.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.