Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2011, 08:57 PM
Ernst Ernst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 285
Default

Yes, if you observe in IL2 your stall IAS is quite the same at any altitude. Why not elevator stiffness based on IAS?
  #2  
Old 01-29-2011, 12:45 AM
Falke Falke is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 41
Default

A few more maps for QMB. I'm gettng bored flying over the same terrain as I do my warm up and practice flights.

Thanks.
S!
  #3  
Old 01-29-2011, 12:52 AM
wheelsup_cavu's Avatar
wheelsup_cavu wheelsup_cavu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Riverside County, California
Posts: 309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falke View Post
A few more maps for QMB. I'm gettng bored flying over the same terrain as I do my warm up and practice flights.

Thanks.
S!
You can create your own using the FMB if you don't want to wait.
A little help about new QMB | Adding your favorite map to the Quick Mission Builder

I don't think Daidalos Team would mind the help if anyone feels inclined to create more missions for the QMB.


Wheels
  #4  
Old 01-29-2011, 07:44 PM
DC338 DC338 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: God's country
Posts: 62
Default

Blackdog your are correct. it is TAS related not IAS related as it should be. I don't think it can be easily fixed however. Probably an entire FM engine rewrite. This has been known about for sometime but not sure if admitted too. It is not just a 109 issue it is an issue for every aircraft. Test for yourself in any aircraft. The G that can be generated at 400km/h at 5000m and 400km/h at 100m is very different. High speed aerodynamics are not a factor at these altitudes or speeds. The problem that this creates is that you have variable G v stick position for a constant IAS with increasing alt. Not ideal for fighting and if not fixed in CoD is a glaring error.

As for fixes. Get rid of sonar sounds. The only thing you should hear in a WW2 piston engined fighter is the engine, radio and perhaps the sound of taking a hit.
  #5  
Old 01-30-2011, 09:31 AM
LukeFF's Avatar
LukeFF LukeFF is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Riverside, California, USA
Posts: 338
Default

Can the fuselage crosses on the K-4 be changed to white instead of the current black?
  #6  
Old 01-30-2011, 09:38 AM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

Not at the moment. Unfortunately Il-2 doesn't allow for three individual national marking types on an aircraft (fuselage and wings underside share the same NM). To change that would take a lot of work and if that workload is justified is questionable now that the successor is in sight.
  #7  
Old 01-30-2011, 10:43 AM
Xilon_x's Avatar
Xilon_x Xilon_x is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 715
Default

because not added the missing nation in the mission and campain?
because not added new pilot skin it uk us jp- to ru fr hu de?
this work i simple.
  #8  
Old 01-31-2011, 09:51 PM
Fenrir's Avatar
Fenrir Fenrir is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by csThor View Post
Not at the moment. Unfortunately Il-2 doesn't allow for three individual national marking types on an aircraft (fuselage and wings underside share the same NM). To change that would take a lot of work and if that workload is justified is questionable now that the successor is in sight.
At the risk of suggesting something that makes for a massive workload, how about the defaults of the the default country have insignia 'on skin', i.e like the current Tempest or the P-47/P-51 amongst others, but keep a separate 'blank' default skin for other countries which apply the MATS as per usual, but keep the MAT applied lettering/numbers for both. This would also sort out dodgy roundels on most RAF types too.

Any benefit to this?
  #9  
Old 02-01-2011, 08:36 AM
LukeFF's Avatar
LukeFF LukeFF is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Riverside, California, USA
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by csThor View Post
Not at the moment. Unfortunately Il-2 doesn't allow for three individual national marking types on an aircraft (fuselage and wings underside share the same NM). To change that would take a lot of work and if that workload is justified is questionable now that the successor is in sight.
Okay.

Any thought given to changing the fuselage and underwing crosses to the black/white cross? It seems to have been a valid marking for K-4s.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.