Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-23-2011, 01:19 PM
FC99's Avatar
FC99 FC99 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mysticpuma View Post
Okay, so the P-47 was renowned as being a real tough bird. I posted this on the ubi forums in 2008 and if you give it the chance and download the audio file, you will here Art Fiedler of the 325th, who flew P-47's and P-51's (He was an Ace in the 51) talking about the problems that pilots encountered in the P-47 and also the fact that he never once saw a wing break of a P-51 except when an undercarriage malfunctioned.
He never saw that because pilots were not stupid enough to kill themselves for nothing. Luckily, USA planes are well documented and lot of these documents are available. When we were making G Limits model we used USA planes to calibrate the model.

If we are talking about P-51 this is snippet of what Air Technical Service Command has to say about it.
Quote:
In order to reduce the possibility of structural failures of the wings on P-51D,P-51K, F-6D and F-6K, two commonly held misconceptions regarding fighter type aircraft must be corrected. These are:
a) The belief that fighter airplanes are designed to such high load factors ("G's")that they are practically indestructible by any readily applied air load.

b) That since the possible loading conditions are relatively few, that unbalance resulting in instability is impossible.
FC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-23-2011, 01:45 PM
Mysticpuma's Avatar
Mysticpuma Mysticpuma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bromsgrove, UK
Posts: 1,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FC99 View Post
He never saw that because pilots were not stupid enough to kill themselves for nothing. Luckily, USA planes are well documented and lot of these documents are available. When we were making G Limits model we used USA planes to calibrate the model.

If we are talking about P-51 this is snippet of what Air Technical Service Command has to say about it.


FC
He flew 67 Missions and was involved in multiple combat fights with the enemy, as-were his other friends (Barrie Davis, Jack Sherbourne, Frank Mertely). The only time they ever saw a wing snap was a pilot who was carrying bombs in a P-51 (then a new tactic) in a dive and as he pulled out, the undercarriage on the right-wing 'fell-out', which soon became fixed. This put the structural integrity of the wing into a failure and the wing tore off.

I am sure there were possible occasions that a p-51 would or could lose a wing, but this was the only time any pilot of the 325th recalled seeing it happen. It was never documented in the P-47's flown by the group other than from enemy action.

I however do trust your information, mine is from pilots who flew and knew how to fly them

Cheers, MP
__________________
http://i41.tinypic.com/2yjr679.png
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-23-2011, 02:03 PM
FC99's Avatar
FC99 FC99 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mysticpuma View Post
I however do trust your information, mine is from pilots who flew and knew how to fly them
And what do you think how Air Technical Service Command formed its opinion and issued Technical Order to all units?

Simple fact is that if you fly the plane within its limits nothing wrong will happen, obviously Art Fiedler and his friends flew the plane the way it was supposed to be flown and the same apply to the game. You will not damage your plane unless you exceed the limits but that doesn't mean that it is impossible to destroy the plane if you mishandle it.

Here are some limits for P-47
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-23-2011, 08:31 PM
DuxCorvan's Avatar
DuxCorvan DuxCorvan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cádiz, Spain
Posts: 86
Default

JtD already said:

*option switch*

But, of course, that won't please the "I-master-full-real" armchair-macho crowd.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-23-2011, 10:22 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Well, some play a game and some want a simulation, no reason to downsize one group.
But, as the servers compete for users, if its a option, it might get watered down to suit the most.
Not what i want, the watering down.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.