![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agreed.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
ABSOLUTELY AGREED
190 is behaving like a lorry. This should be looked over, wether perfomance Data is correct. Especially when compared with other Fighter Planes of the Aera it seems to be messed up. Since I have no Data to proof this I just can politely ask for checking, whether my 'feeling' about the various types of the 190 is correct. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
From the sources I have come across, the 190 (the captured A series) could take off within the same distance as a Spit. It might be me, but I sure as hell can't get a 190 up in the same distance.
I read this in Alfred Price' 'Spitfire story' |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes tested Fw 190 at 1.6 Ata had similar take off runing to Spitfie Mark IX Merlin 66 engine.
Stock Fw 190 A series in IL2 had reduced acceleration ( intentionaly or not) but at least in ultrapack we corrected these issue many time ago with all new FM's Fw190s |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I tested the new slots of Fw 190 but I think the acceleration was improved a little, but I still feeling slow the acceleration
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|