1C and Ubisoft Announce IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

[Mad G]

Originally Posted by He111

I cannot find the Recommend machine config??? please help, and will multiple screens be supported? and what is the recommended Graphics card? ATI or Nvidia?

Please help, I'm off to buy a computer! (maybe a sandy bridge CPU?)

thanks

He111.

Specs Config...

Intel i7 950 Bloomfield 3.06GHz @ 4.20GHz
Gigabyte X58A UD3r Rev.2.0
Gigabyte GTX 580 @ 870/1740/2109
G.Skill RipJaws DDR3 1600 6GB
SSD G.Skill Phoenix Pro 60GB
WDC WD5000AAKS-00V1A
Corsair TX850W
Win 7 64 bits Ultimate

...mine

[Oldschool61]

Originally Posted by Mad G

Specs Config...

Intel i7 950 Bloomfield 3.06GHz @ 4.20GHz
Gigabyte X58A UD3r Rev.2.0
Gigabyte GTX 580 @ 870/1740/2109
G.Skill RipJaws DDR3 1600 6GB
SSD G.Skill Phoenix Pro 60GB
WDC WD5000AAKS-00V1A
Corsair TX850W
Win 7 64 bits Ultimate

...mine

Wow impressive. I think your trying to compensate for a small penis!!

[Mad G]

Originally Posted by Oldschool61

Wow impressive. I think your trying to compensate for a small penis!!

Ah, ah, ah...not really bro, never had a complaint from the ladies, by the contrary!

I had a rig for 6 years with AGP with a Pentium4 3.4 GHz sockett 478 2GB DDR 3200 and a 7800 GS so it was time to a major update waiting for SOW:BOB/ Cliffs of Dover somewhere in the first quart of Century XXI and luckily it will be March/ April this year.

What I´ve read somewhere is that the basic config requirement is a i7 950, 8 gigs of RAM and a 1GB video card. So, lots of small dicks

[booterboy]

Good news on release date,congrats to dev team.
Really looking forward to CoD.
Hope enough money is made to continue the series.
Pity the dev team were'nt giving the resources/manpower for better graphics(not having a dig).
Best wishes to Oleg and team,pc gaming badly needs devs like you.

[Triggaaar]

Originally Posted by booterboy

Pity the dev team were'nt giving the resources/manpower for better graphics(not having a dig).

Ok, you're not having a dig, it's your honest opinion - no problem. But... what are you talking about? Are you talking about graphics on screenshots that are not at maximum settings? Whatever you're referring to, the graphics haven't been limited by the resources of the development team, they'll be limited by the capabilites of today's PCs. There's so much processing involved in a decent combat sim that the PCs will struggle. I think the graphics (when at the best settings) will be great, but when they hit the limit it will be due to PC power, not development resources.

[booterboy]

Originally Posted by Triggaaar

Ok, you're not having a dig, it's your honest opinion - no problem. But... what are you talking about? Are you talking about graphics on screenshots that are not at maximum settings? Whatever you're referring to, the graphics haven't been limited by the resources of the development team, they'll be limited by the capabilites of today's PCs. There's so much processing involved in a decent combat sim that the PCs will struggle. I think the graphics (when at the best settings) will be great, but when they hit the limit it will be due to PC power, not development resources.

Will have to wait for proper hd ingame vids on max settings to decide.
Its 2011,i know flight/gameplay will be great,just hoping gfx are up to scratch
to add to the immersion.just saying that if the dev team had a bigger budget/resources it could be the best looking combat/flight sim out there.
I know how much processing is involved but with quad core overclocked
processors and sli theres no excuse for poor fps/screen tearing etc.
anywho heres hoping for the best combat sim ever.

[Triggaaar]

Originally Posted by booterboy

Its 2011,i know flight/gameplay will be great,just hoping gfx are up to scratch

I'm sure they will be. But you won't be able to fairly compare graphics from a combat sim with those of a basic flight sim for example.

just saying that if the dev team had a bigger budget/resources it could be the best looking combat/flight sim out there.

I expect this will be the best looking combat sim out there as it is.

I know how much processing is involved but with quad core overclocked processors and sli theres no excuse for poor fps/screen tearing etc.

I think you'll find that limits are due to the PCs we own, not due to the size or budget of the development team. Some of us may have OC'd i7s and SLi, but the game also has to run on lower spec'ed machines too, which puts a limit on what can be included. If you read through all the update threads you'll see where Oleg has given examples of limitations imposed by PC power, such as 3D craters.

anywho heres hoping for the best combat sim ever.

Indeed. I have no doubts it will be.

[imaca]

Originally Posted by Triggaaar

Ok, you're not having a dig, it's your honest opinion - no problem. But... what are you talking about? Are you talking about graphics on screenshots that are not at maximum settings? Whatever you're referring to, the graphics haven't been limited by the resources of the development team, they'll be limited by the capabilites of today's PCs. There's so much processing involved in a decent combat sim that the PCs will struggle. I think the graphics (when at the best settings) will be great, but when they hit the limit it will be due to PC power, not development resources.

Its noticeable in the screenies there are almost no walls/fences/hedges.
I can imagine adding them would be quite a lot of work.
Or would it just add too much more load to the graphics system?
What do you think?

[jcenzano]

Originally Posted by imaca

Its noticeable in the screenies there are almost no walls/fences/hedges.
I can imagine adding them would be quite a lot of work.
Or would it just add too much more load to the graphics system?
What do you think?

unbelievable...

[Baron]

Originally Posted by imaca

Its noticeable in the screenies there are almost no walls/fences/hedges.
I can imagine adding them would be quite a lot of work.
Or would it just add too much more load to the graphics system?
What do you think?

Oleg awnsered that question himselfe a while back. Adding fences for ex. everywhere they should be would add an unreasenble amount of workload for the pc with with very little return in overall experiance (lets face it, when are u gonna see them). Im sure mission buliders can add them arround airfields and such (guessing) for example.