![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
This forum has got cancer. Caused, mainly, by a bunch of spoilt brats. If putting words into Olegs mouth, wild speculation and negativity are your thing then look no further than the 1c IL-2 forum. I've said it before, some on here act like a gang of moaning old ladies. I've some advice.. If you don't like the DRM/Box/Graphics/Campaign/Publisher/Name/Spitfire Manual/ then don't buy the game. Simple. It'll be a good way of cleaning out the games gene pool too. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eh?
You can have your say and I can't have mine? Just rude. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Exactly. The people who see the problem of the title are not unhappy because they just think it sounds bad. These are the people who are thinking not just for themselves but for others and the future. The people who don't see a problem are the ones that think "Its not a problem for me, I know its a new game and I'm buying whatever, If you don't like it don't buy it" this is a selfish way of thinking.
The fact is the the majority of people who may be inclined to buy this game will not know anything like as much as most people on this forum. Someone may see IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of dover on a shop shelf and say to themselves "wow is that old game still going? are they still making updates?, anyway I think I'd rather get something a bit newer" Storm of war: Cliffs of dover, is too clunky and as someone else mentioned there are too many ...... of ...... titled games. It would also need a sticker saying from the makers of Il-2, which isn't ideal. I suggested Sturmovik 2: Cliffs of dover,would have been better because it is clearly shows it is a new game and of the IL-2 series. Just by looking at the name the shop buyer would now think "wow a sequel to Il-2 Sturmovik, I used to love that old game. I'm going to have to try this new one" It works both ways and it is a pretty cool word afterall. The fact the it Cliffs of dover just happens to have the same abbreviation as another game is not a problem at all. I really don't think anyone here will be going around calling the game cod. To me it is a childish thing to use an abbreviation of a very short sentence and not some thing the type of people who will be interested in this would do. This is neither confusing nor a marketing problem.
__________________
XBL GT: - Robotic Pope HyperLobby CS: - Robot_Pope Last edited by Robotic Pope; 01-19-2011 at 03:52 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
What outcome do you expect out of a thread like this? The name will be changed back before the release now that it's already out and pre-ordered by thousands? Oh dear.. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
XBL GT: - Robotic Pope HyperLobby CS: - Robot_Pope |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Those who already play IL-2 know CoD is coming, and don't care what its called, and the market is cemented. The publishers *think* they will gain more customers by making it sound like it is part of IL-2, but it might actually turn away customers because they think it is yet another "installment" to a 10 year old game that costs a lot. It is human nature to always get the latest, and it is marketing 101 that sometimes you have to start a fresh brand name to get the maximum return. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
It's amazing where this moaning has gone to now that there is no screenshot to whine about. "Yes, it's all about making the game better by providing suggestions blah blah.." Yeah right. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|