Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > Men of War > Men of War: Assault Squad

Men of War: Assault Squad Sequel to the critically acclaimed real-time tactics game Men of War

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-16-2011, 12:01 PM
SpeedWolf's Avatar
SpeedWolf SpeedWolf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikitns View Post
check out dms forums mate, the 1C forum is dead.
To:Nikitns
I'm sure he is here because of the bullies in DMS who is trolling everybody that have a opinion about Assault Squad.

To:Crnivuk
May i suggest when you post a topic in DMS to put up a poll in your topic like my friend Evilsausage did here .

This is the only way to show if people support your idea or not without needing to comment. because we know what happen when we give a opinion about Assault Squad.

as for your topic here. this what i have to say.

you will have to be lucky. you will not always kill a tank in one shot from the side every time.

i don't think it need to be change but of course is my own opinion and i will not bully you to agree with me unlike some people we know in DMS.
__________________
[CENTER]
===

Last edited by SpeedWolf; 01-16-2011 at 01:00 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-16-2011, 10:52 PM
CzaD CzaD is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 117
Default

"I'm sure he is here because of the bullies in DMS who is trolling everybody that have a opinion about Assault Squad."

Can't agree more. I am fed up with DMS forum. I tried to be helpful and supportive. But if moderators and admins can't think of another idea rather than closing threads, I don't see any point of posting anything there. Nothing stops the same few troublemakers from waging flame wars in order to get any thread they don't like closed. It is sad coz it is a forum where the devs are supposed to meet the players and discuss ideas. Atm, every new topic is spammed by the same few people and I don't see new players joining in the discussion, despite the fact the Steam community is constantly growing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-17-2011, 01:57 AM
SpeedWolf's Avatar
SpeedWolf SpeedWolf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CzaD View Post
Can't agree more. I am fed up with DMS forum. I tried to be helpful and supportive. But if moderators and admins can't think of another idea rather than closing threads, I don't see any point of posting anything there. Nothing stops the same few troublemakers from waging flame wars in order to get any thread they don't like closed. It is sad coz it is a forum where the devs are supposed to meet the players and discuss ideas. Atm, every new topic is spammed by the same few people and I don't see new players joining in the discussion, despite the fact the Steam community is constantly growing.

I am a exclusive tester as well under a different name and i can tell you this that the same 3 bullies are doing the same in the exclusive tester forum as well.

even that i don't agree with your idea here about the side shot. it's your right to have a polite opinion even if 99% of the people disagree with you.

but why this 3 bullies have to go to everybody topic and calling everybody that have a opinion/suggestion about assault squad. a "noob" or "you don't know what your talking about" or "your a troll" they even go as far as calling someone a thief and a criminal by saying that they're playing a illegal copy of the game.

someone need to post a topic here about the bullies/troll in DMS because nobody can have a friendly/polite discussion without this 3 bullies/troll in it without making it in to something else.
__________________
[CENTER]
===

Last edited by SpeedWolf; 01-17-2011 at 02:21 AM. Reason: Edited do to a typo.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-17-2011, 12:38 PM
CzaD CzaD is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedWolf View Post

even that i don't agree with your idea here about the side shot.
What do you mean?

For myself, I complained about the situation to a DMS moderator who said nothing can be done about it at the moment.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-17-2011, 01:37 PM
SpeedWolf's Avatar
SpeedWolf SpeedWolf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CzaD View Post
What do you mean?
I was speaking about your topic that the gun don't always kill a tank from the side.
__________________
[CENTER]
===
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-17-2011, 05:34 PM
CzaD CzaD is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 117
Default

Could you post a link, pls? I can't remember any topics like that.
Anyway, I guess your main point is that it doesn't matter if you agree or disagree or like or dislike a topic, what matters is that bahaviour on DMS forum must improve to stop threads from being closed.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-18-2011, 04:59 AM
SpeedWolf's Avatar
SpeedWolf SpeedWolf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CzaD View Post
Could you post a link, pls? I can't remember any topics like that.
Anyway, I guess your main point is that it doesn't matter if you agree or disagree or like or dislike a topic, what matters is that bahaviour on DMS forum must improve to stop threads from being closed.
I was talking about this one or i misunderstood your topic.

as for Digitalmindsoft forum i don't know is was not always like this. before when someone make a flam war both party got ban for a month in the Digitalmindsoft forum.

maybe because they paid for the BETA that they can get away with their bad behavior.
__________________
[CENTER]
===
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-24-2011, 03:48 AM
Crni vuk Crni vuk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedWolf View Post
To:Nikitns
I'm sure he is here because of the bullies in DMS who is trolling everybody that have a opinion about Assault Squad.
Thank you for your very kind words

And yeah I know what you mean with the situation you explained. Though to say that I registered here first back before As was in development. I just thought it would be the only forum regarding mow and its expansions.

On the other side. I mean as said I dont dissagree with people who have a different oppinion as long they explain their point and have some logic behind it. And even if I do NOT share the point one can always agree to dissagree in a respectfull maner. There certainly is no "correct" way to play a game like Mow just your oppinion what you personaly think might work best in the end (I mean the game is NOT a simulation afterall, a complex RTS that for sure). So when I make a point I dont say that I am right and others are now wrong. But hey I love argue what should I say

The only thing I REALLY dissliked was (as you explained) the people which get in, say something like "its useless yada yada yada, just learn flanking yada yada, if you alow them Kingtiger you have done something wrong or never play games with high resources etc. etc." as like its the magical answer to everything. Of course sure we could talk about everything and always stop everything with such kind of arguments. But I think a healthy discussion is more worth then a forum where everything goes like a game is perfect. And actualy I am surprised how many people seriously think that both Mow and As would use "realistic" data for the tanks penetration making it equal to a simulation O.o
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.