4.10 Support & Bug Reporting

[Ernst]

Originally Posted by SkyFan

Dear DT members, next issue concerns playback of ntrk-records created before. As youy can see the visualization of bomb's explosions existed earlier in 4.09m and others previous versions is absent during watching the same ntrk-records in 4.10m.
Please compare two attached images: 4.09m (to left) with explosion and 4.10m (to right) without it in the same record.
Is it possible to solve described issue?
Thank you beforehand.
Sincerely.

I think you experienced the new bomb fusing feature. Your bomb did not explode! Muahahaha! I am lovin' this new patch!

[SkyFan]

Hi, dear Ernst

Originally Posted by Ernst

I think you experienced the new bomb fusing feature

I really did it, but it was few days ago and result was normal. Ntrk-record with two destroyed ships by P-63 is attached here:
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=147
If you doubt according my ability for successful skip-bombing in 4.10m just watch it and also the next one attached to current post ("SF_Sparr_17_410_complete).

Originally Posted by Ernst

Your bomb did not explode!

Exploded, be sure.

Originally Posted by Ernst

Muahahaha!

Really I have to laugh but not you: if you were alert as each pilot must to be, you should note that the text according destroyed target and compteted mission presents in both images, an altitude, speed, direction, time (1:00) are also the same in both images.
In this case it would be easy for you to believe me that both images concern to the same record made in 4.09 long before 4.10s appearance and the target was really destroyed.
But when I watch this record in 4.09m explosion presents at the picture and when I watch the same record in 4.10m explosion became unvisible, but ship sinking.
So, the issue is not in bomb explosion, but in its wrong visualization in 4.10m
It may lead for example to incorrect playback of ntrk-records created in previous versions or incorrect playback of movies in campaigns.
I hope it's clear now?
Best regards

P.S.If you still don't believe me, please watch the record "SF_Sparr_27_3ships_complete_409" in each version which you want (4.09m, 4.10m or both) and became sure. I made images just of this record. And additionally to avoid misunderstanding: SF in records name means SkyFan as a mission builder and test pilot, Sparr is the author of further campaign's idea, 17 & 27 - numbers of missions, 409 & 410 - version of the game etc.

P.P.S, Dear Roblex, thank you for explanation.

[NN_LUSO]

Question (may be stupid), but this is not normal with PropPitch 100%, to always have the same engine speed (2700 rpm) with 100%, then 90, 80, 70, 60%, I had to reach 50% for 2650tr, then 2500 to 40%.

UP.

[Ernst]

Ok, SkyFan. Only a joking. I believe you. Sorry for my bad joke and sarcasm. Salute!

[SkyFan]

Originally Posted by Ernst

Ok, SkyFan. Only a joking. I believe you.

Sorry, may be my bad English didn't let me to understand it

Originally Posted by Ernst

Sorry for my bad joke and sarcasm. Salute!

Everything is OK, relax and have a nice New Year

[EJGr.Ost_Caspar]

Originally Posted by NN_LUSO

UP.

Maybe we should guess, what plane it is? Could be a long night then.

[bolox]

another little Junkers error



torp control box missing in nose gun position of both torp versions of ju88

[NN_LUSO]

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar

Maybe we should guess, what plane it is? Could be a long night then.

Sorry,the Yaks planes!!

[EJGr.Ost_Caspar]

I don't know, what numbers are suitable for Yak fighters, but the ones you named, do not sound strange to me. And yes, at a fixed power (throttle) setting, a fixed prop pitch mean stable revolutions (RPM). You must understand, 100% propitch doesn't mean a flat propellar. The pitch is set for a wanted RPM.

I still wonder, what seems so strange to you in this?

[FS~Phat]

Noticed a few other have commented on this also and DT has not yet offered a comment on my post several pages ago and the more recent posts by people??

I can fly level with about 12% down elevator trim in 4.09m but require about 32% with 4.10m. This does indeed effect the flight model and response of the aircraft when trimmed for level flight.
Can DT please advise if this was intentional and by design or if it's a potential bug?

cheers