![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by Ernst; 12-30-2010 at 05:06 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi, dear Ernst
![]() I really did it, but it was few days ago and result was normal. Ntrk-record with two destroyed ships by P-63 is attached here: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=147 If you doubt according my ability for successful skip-bombing in 4.10m just watch it and also the next one attached to current post ("SF_Sparr_17_410_complete). Exploded, be sure. Really I have to laugh but not you: if you were alert as each pilot must to be, you should note that the text according destroyed target and compteted mission presents in both images, an altitude, speed, direction, time (1:00) are also the same in both images. In this case it would be easy for you to believe me that both images concern to the same record made in 4.09 long before 4.10s appearance and the target was really destroyed. But when I watch this record in 4.09m explosion presents at the picture and when I watch the same record in 4.10m explosion became unvisible, but ship sinking. So, the issue is not in bomb explosion, but in its wrong visualization in 4.10m It may lead for example to incorrect playback of ntrk-records created in previous versions or incorrect playback of movies in campaigns. I hope it's clear now? Best regards ![]() P.S.If you still don't believe me, please watch the record "SF_Sparr_27_3ships_complete_409" in each version which you want (4.09m, 4.10m or both) and became sure. I made images just of this record. And additionally to avoid misunderstanding: SF in records name means SkyFan as a mission builder and test pilot, Sparr is the author of further campaign's idea, 17 & 27 - numbers of missions, 409 & 410 - version of the game etc. P.P.S, Dear Roblex, thank you for explanation. Last edited by SkyFan; 12-30-2010 at 08:15 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, SkyFan. Only a joking. I believe you. Sorry for my bad joke and sarcasm. Salute!
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sorry, may be my bad English didn't let me to understand it
![]() Everything is OK, relax and have a nice New Year ![]() Last edited by SkyFan; 12-31-2010 at 09:49 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
---------------------------------------------- For bugreports, help and support contact: daidalos.team@googlemail.com For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications: IL-Modeling Bible |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
another little Junkers error
![]() torp control box missing in nose gun position of both torp versions of ju88 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Sorry,the Yaks planes!! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know, what numbers are suitable for Yak fighters, but the ones you named, do not sound strange to me. And yes, at a fixed power (throttle) setting, a fixed prop pitch mean stable revolutions (RPM). You must understand, 100% propitch doesn't mean a flat propellar. The pitch is set for a wanted RPM.
I still wonder, what seems so strange to you in this?
__________________
---------------------------------------------- For bugreports, help and support contact: daidalos.team@googlemail.com For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications: IL-Modeling Bible |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Noticed a few other have commented on this also and DT has not yet offered a comment on my post several pages ago and the more recent posts by people??
I can fly level with about 12% down elevator trim in 4.09m but require about 32% with 4.10m. This does indeed effect the flight model and response of the aircraft when trimmed for level flight. Can DT please advise if this was intentional and by design or if it's a potential bug? cheers |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|