Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2010, 05:03 PM
Ernst Ernst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyFan View Post
Dear DT members, next issue concerns playback of ntrk-records created before. As youy can see the visualization of bomb's explosions existed earlier in 4.09m and others previous versions is absent during watching the same ntrk-records in 4.10m.
Please compare two attached images: 4.09m (to left) with explosion and 4.10m (to right) without it in the same record.
Is it possible to solve described issue?
Thank you beforehand.
Sincerely.
I think you experienced the new bomb fusing feature. Your bomb did not explode! Muahahaha! I am lovin' this new patch!

Last edited by Ernst; 12-30-2010 at 05:06 PM.
  #2  
Old 12-30-2010, 07:47 PM
SkyFan's Avatar
SkyFan SkyFan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 19
Default

Hi, dear Ernst
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernst View Post
I think you experienced the new bomb fusing feature
I really did it, but it was few days ago and result was normal. Ntrk-record with two destroyed ships by P-63 is attached here:
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=147
If you doubt according my ability for successful skip-bombing in 4.10m just watch it and also the next one attached to current post ("SF_Sparr_17_410_complete).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernst View Post
Your bomb did not explode!
Exploded, be sure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernst View Post
Muahahaha!
Really I have to laugh but not you: if you were alert as each pilot must to be, you should note that the text according destroyed target and compteted mission presents in both images, an altitude, speed, direction, time (1:00) are also the same in both images.
In this case it would be easy for you to believe me that both images concern to the same record made in 4.09 long before 4.10s appearance and the target was really destroyed.
But when I watch this record in 4.09m explosion presents at the picture and when I watch the same record in 4.10m explosion became unvisible, but ship sinking.
So, the issue is not in bomb explosion, but in its wrong visualization in 4.10m
It may lead for example to incorrect playback of ntrk-records created in previous versions or incorrect playback of movies in campaigns.

I hope it's clear now?
Best regards

P.S.If you still don't believe me, please watch the record "SF_Sparr_27_3ships_complete_409" in each version which you want (4.09m, 4.10m or both) and became sure. I made images just of this record. And additionally to avoid misunderstanding: SF in records name means SkyFan as a mission builder and test pilot, Sparr is the author of further campaign's idea, 17 & 27 - numbers of missions, 409 & 410 - version of the game etc.

P.P.S, Dear Roblex, thank you for explanation.
Attached Files
File Type: zip SF_Sparr_17_410_complete.zip (1.21 MB, 7 views)
File Type: zip SF_Sparr_27_3ships_complete_409.zip (622.8 KB, 2 views)

Last edited by SkyFan; 12-30-2010 at 08:15 PM.
  #3  
Old 12-30-2010, 08:44 PM
NN_LUSO NN_LUSO is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Question (may be stupid), but this is not normal with PropPitch 100%, to always have the same engine speed (2700 rpm) with 100%, then 90, 80, 70, 60%, I had to reach 50% for 2650tr, then 2500 to 40%.
UP.
  #4  
Old 12-30-2010, 08:54 PM
Ernst Ernst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 285
Default

Ok, SkyFan. Only a joking. I believe you. Sorry for my bad joke and sarcasm. Salute!
  #5  
Old 12-31-2010, 08:51 AM
SkyFan's Avatar
SkyFan SkyFan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernst View Post
Ok, SkyFan. Only a joking. I believe you.
Sorry, may be my bad English didn't let me to understand it
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernst View Post
Sorry for my bad joke and sarcasm. Salute!
Everything is OK, relax and have a nice New Year

Last edited by SkyFan; 12-31-2010 at 09:49 AM.
  #6  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:25 PM
EJGr.Ost_Caspar EJGr.Ost_Caspar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NN_LUSO View Post
Quote:
Question (may be stupid), but this is not normal with PropPitch 100%, to always have the same engine speed (2700 rpm) with 100%, then 90, 80, 70, 60%, I had to reach 50% for 2650tr, then 2500 to 40%.
UP.
Maybe we should guess, what plane it is? Could be a long night then.
__________________

----------------------------------------------
For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com

For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications:
IL-Modeling Bible
  #7  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:58 PM
bolox bolox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 351
Default

another little Junkers error



torp control box missing in nose gun position of both torp versions of ju88
  #8  
Old 12-30-2010, 10:30 PM
NN_LUSO NN_LUSO is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar View Post
Maybe we should guess, what plane it is? Could be a long night then.

Sorry,the Yaks planes!!
  #9  
Old 12-30-2010, 11:55 PM
EJGr.Ost_Caspar EJGr.Ost_Caspar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 939
Default

I don't know, what numbers are suitable for Yak fighters, but the ones you named, do not sound strange to me. And yes, at a fixed power (throttle) setting, a fixed prop pitch mean stable revolutions (RPM). You must understand, 100% propitch doesn't mean a flat propellar. The pitch is set for a wanted RPM.

I still wonder, what seems so strange to you in this?
__________________

----------------------------------------------
For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com

For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications:
IL-Modeling Bible
  #10  
Old 12-31-2010, 01:49 AM
FS~Phat FS~Phat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 609
Default Repost - Spitfire Elevator Trim

Noticed a few other have commented on this also and DT has not yet offered a comment on my post several pages ago and the more recent posts by people??

I can fly level with about 12% down elevator trim in 4.09m but require about 32% with 4.10m. This does indeed effect the flight model and response of the aircraft when trimmed for level flight.
Can DT please advise if this was intentional and by design or if it's a potential bug?

cheers
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.