![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Any soldier knows he might be at the receiving end sometimes.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If you are a soldier and don't eliminate the enemy when you have the best chance, then you just failed. Elimination can be killing or capturing the enemy. And don't take honour into this. I haven't written about honour. Stay in line. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Forget it you are hopeless. I know many soldiers that would boot you for that kind of attitude. Pointless in carrying on.
![]() It also shows you know little of military tactics, a dead soldier is done with, a wounded soldier binds more man power reducing the enemies fighting ability. But sure put a bullet in the persons head big sacrifice pulling the trigger. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But if you are a fighter pilot, do you have those choises? No you don't. You can't only wound the soldier. You can't supress him. You can't capture him. You can only eliminate him by killing him. If he flies over your country, then you can gamble and let him go down to get captured. Those are the choises. Or of course there is that sandbox choise "we just shoot planes down." It is good in gaming or if you fear yourself of being shot down. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Would you throw a grenade into a barn full of unarmed POW soilders? Or execute anyone and everyone who surrendered? Talk all you like about 'kill everyone who could possibly kill you at somepoint in the future' that argument could also be used to justify bombing children. It's a flawed argument. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And I am not talking about killing everyone. I have been specifically talking about eliminating the enemy. The enemy means enemy soldiers. Eliminating includes killing, supressing, capturing, whatever to make them not a threat. Forcing an enemy pilot to bail out is like forcing him to do a tactical retreat. Definetly he is not eliminated if bailed out over his lands. He is shooting at you, your friends, and your countrymen next day like in Battle of Britain. Edit: And if we take "honour" into this, I would be interested to know what kind of honour standards Japanese had. Also I am interested of Polish pilots. Why they fought so mercilessly. At least there is no way I could say they were dishonourable right away. Maybe they had standards like "no mercy untill it is over". Edit: If it would not be bad for the population inside the genre and if my current squadron would allow I would start fer sure a "chute shooters club" squadron Edit: Will someone agro if I say "i lol when I shoot a chute" Last edited by moilami; 12-13-2010 at 08:18 PM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I absolutely agree with winny carrying on here is pointless, as a door has more understanding. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|