Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-10-2010, 04:29 PM
Oleg Maddox Oleg Maddox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG27CaptStubing View Post
I would go more with Blue...
It is depending of gazoline, pressure, RPM, and so many other factors... Even at different altitudes it is different really...

We have original table of the exhaust colors by which British crew were need to define is in good or not so good conditions the engine before the flight...
  #2  
Old 12-10-2010, 04:35 PM
KOM.Nausicaa KOM.Nausicaa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oleg Maddox View Post
It is depending of gazoline, pressure, RPM, and so many other factors... Even at different altitudes it is different really...

We have original table of the exhaust colors by which British crew were need to define is in good or not so good conditions the engine before the flight...

Ok, but even if it's dependent on those factors, and there would be set of factors that would produce yellow colors like in the video you posted, it's still too yellow. Actually, the problem is (as far as I can see in compressed video) that the spectrum is too narrow. There should be a wider range of subtle hue/value (not saturation) difference in the different flames as they appear, in some random pattern.
It's however hard to tell -- who knows what the video codec does, and then it's that everyone has a different monitor. I played it however on my color calibrated Wacom Cintiq, and that is what I thought first.
  #3  
Old 12-10-2010, 07:44 PM
changai changai is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oleg Maddox View Post
It is depending of gazoline, pressure, RPM, and so many other factors... Even at different altitudes it is different really...
Actually, Winny is right, it doesn't depend on those factors.
Color is related to the temperature of gases produced during combustion: the hotter, the whiter; the colder, the redder. Blue indicates a very high temperature. Near-perfect combustion of hydrocarbons is always blue.

Yellow indicates an imperfect combustion, i.e. lack of combustive agent (usually air) which causes production of soot, i.e. smoke. However, even a very rich mixture as used on a cold engine would not produce yellow flames, but add a yellowish hue at the end of blue flames.

Red indicates a very bad combustion. A damaged engine burning oil would probably produce reddish flames.

Hope this helps
  #4  
Old 12-10-2010, 08:06 PM
Redwan Redwan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 77
Default

Fantastic job !!!
  #5  
Old 12-10-2010, 08:11 PM
Flanker Flanker is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 25
Default

The sound of the plane is the same as in il-2. Is it just temporary or final?
  #6  
Old 12-10-2010, 08:18 PM
AdMan AdMan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oleg's ignore list
Posts: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winny View Post
Flame colour has nothing to do with the angle you view it from or the length of the exhaust pipe, it is nothing to do with temperature either. It simply shows how efficiently the fuel is burning.

If the combustion is burning all the carbon you get blue flames and no smoke. If there's carbon coming out in the exhaust gases then you'll get yellow-er/smoky-er flame.

This is chemistry not opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by changai View Post
Actually, Winny is right, it doesn't depend on those factors.
Color is related to the temperature of gases produced during combustion: the hotter, the whiter; the colder, the redder. Blue indicates a very high temperature. Near-perfect combustion of hydrocarbons is always blue.

Yellow indicates an imperfect combustion, i.e. lack of combustive agent (usually air) which causes production of soot, i.e. smoke. However, even a very rich mixture as used on a cold engine would not produce yellow flames, but add a yellowish hue at the end of blue flames.

Red indicates a very bad combustion. A damaged engine burning oil would probably produce reddish flames.

Hope this helps
these people seem to make sense
  #7  
Old 12-10-2010, 08:24 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdMan View Post
these people seem to make sense
Yes, it's the 'Ki gas' primer I don't know about.
  #8  
Old 12-10-2010, 08:27 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oleg Maddox View Post
Please read with atention: The color of exhaust from the direct pipe and from the extended are different. The temperatue of the flame decreasing with the longer leght of pipe. More lower temperature - more red flame. The most hight is right from the hole without pipe.

As I told above a lot of factors is present in forming of color.
Exactly. In general, hot=blue, cool=red/yellow, plus a flame that's seen directly exiting the piston will be hotter than a flame seen after travelling the entire length of the exhaust pipe.

So, since the colour is a function of exhaust gas temperature, i guess that running on higher power will produce bluer flames. Also, leaning the mixture at night could be done by watching the flames, you just have to lean until the highest exhaust gas temp which means the bluest flame you can get, then enrich it again just a tad from that point.

I might know how the stuff generally works but it don't know what the correct colour for each circumstance is. However, i'm really excited about these features because they give the impression of a real, working machine under the hood. Excellent update!




Quote:
Originally Posted by winny View Post
Flame colour has nothing to do with the angle you view it from or the length of the exhaust pipe, it is nothing to do with temperature either. It simply shows how efficiently the fuel is burning.

If the combustion is burning all the carbon you get blue flames and no smoke. If there's carbon coming out in the exhaust gases then you'll get yellow-er/smoky-er flame.

This is chemistry not opinion.
...and the way pilots of prop driven aircraft adjust their mixture today is by, guess what, a temperature gauge that monitors how hot the exhaust gas is. So you're correct generally, except the part where you say it has nothing to do with temperature. This is also not opinion but physics, whatever burns hotter is to the blue/white side of the spectrum and stuff that burns cooler is to the red/yellow side. It's the reason even the stars are not all the same colour. Cheers


Edit: I just saw you corrected it yourself
  #9  
Old 12-10-2010, 08:44 PM
LukeFF's Avatar
LukeFF LukeFF is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Riverside, California, USA
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanker View Post
The sound of the plane is the same as in il-2. Is it just temporary or final?
Did you read Oleg's first post?
  #10  
Old 12-10-2010, 08:51 PM
TeeJay82 TeeJay82 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Siljan, Norway
Posts: 233
Default

Engine runs with an external program... to me it sounds like your utilizing the a2a`s accusim

is this the case?
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.