![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
| View Poll Results: Moderators in the weekly update threads. | |||
| Moderators should intervene more in the update threads |
|
194 | 70.80% |
| Moderators should intervene less in the update threads |
|
11 | 4.01% |
| The present work of moderators is just fine |
|
69 | 25.18% |
| Voters: 274. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just remove postings...you say
Deletion of postings should not be required. Most of the members on this boards are adults. In tune with the requests on this thread. The coming update thread will be more severely enforced. No big deal, 1 week bans to members posting off topic - first offense. It will not matter if you have been a member of this board for 3 years and have a good record. OFF TOPIC IS OFF TOPIC, no warnings. The current update thread is locked because of all the OFF TOPIC postings. Report OFF TOPIC POSTINGS when you see them. Moderators can't read every posting 24/7. Thanks |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
You have my condolences. I've done it, being a mod is a thankless job. Now because things were perceived to be too far one way, you have to swing it back hard the other. Seriously, thank you for your efforts and good luck in trying to keep everyone happy. It reminds me of when my pitching coach used to come out to the mound to talk to me...."Don't give him anything to hit and don't walk him.". Good luck! Splitter |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
LOL Adman & KG26 Alpha. You guys are hillarious
WRT the moderation of update threads, I support Nearmiss' new direction which will hopefully calm things down a bit (I find the on-topic discussion in those threads very interesting). To all those that worry about the stifling of free speech and moderator power trips, I suppose we could revisit this after a couple of weeks' worth of doing things Nearmiss' way. My gut (and the poll) tells me that the majority of us will appreciate the changes. Cheers, Fafnir_6 Last edited by Fafnir_6; 11-24-2010 at 09:04 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Hopefully this means Oleg and others will find it easier to pick out the questions from the comments/bickering. Maybe people could tag direct questions with an *asterisk to make it easier? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
+1 on Yes! More moderation - less noise.
/Daniel |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It would be a shame if the thread is going well, then on the 4th page someone says how great it is that there's been no off topic chat, and they're suddenly banned for a week (because they haven't read this thread). |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
People can still ramble on about whatever they want if they can't contain themselves, but it's easy for those not interested to just side-step it and focus on the main theme. In any case, this new rule is only for the update threads. In fact, it was very recently that it was announced the rest of the forum would be open to more off-topic discussions in an effort to keep a healthy exchange going at all times, so it's not like we're being stiffled here. After all, we are the ones asking for a tighter grip on the update threads. I still wouldn't do it this way (outright bans) but then i'm not the one who has to spend time enforcing the new rules and since we have the rest of the forum open to a wide variety of other subjects, it's all good and fine by me. However, i totally agree with you that this had to be communicated in a clear fashion. Just how much straying from the screenshot is going to be allowed is something everyone needs to be made aware of before they start reading and posting in the update thread. For example, if someone posts references to back up their claim that a cockpit gauge needs a correction, is this on topic or not? Or what if someone posts historical references that pertain to tactics and employment of certain weapon systems (for example "this kind of flak gunner emplacement only had one gun of type X and not two")? Same for purely technical matters that pertain to the accuracy of 3d models, etc. Finally, posting the usual praise can pretty repetitive ("thanks for the update","awesome work, keep it up" etc), is this going to be off limits with the thread focusing exclusively on discussing the update's content, or not? I'm all for imposing some limits on the update threads, it's just that they need to be clearly communicated so people know what to expect. Last edited by Blackdog_kt; 11-25-2010 at 06:17 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|