![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
This title would be too neutered and watered down. It doesn't really grab you.
"Battle of Brittain" tells you exactly what it's about. "Brittain 1940" could be an old travel report. And AvSim+ sounds like a nutritional supplement. The great George Carlin had it right: |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mmm, wel the first half was good, but it seems he stopped thinking and just started spouting drivle by the end. A bit OT though.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's 1C-Softclub that wanted to call it "IL-2", not Ubi, as far as we know.
Quote:
(OMG was obviously a joke, but hey, it could work |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
1CiL-2SoWBoB......simple.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oleg Maddox presents THE BATTLE OF BRITAIN Storm of War seriesFrom the creaters of IL2: Forgotten Battles With appropriate text and graphics and a lovely picture blah blah blah. Inspiration taken from the Pacific Fighters box art. the Storm of War bit is to build brand awareness if that's what they want to do. replace The Battle of Britain with Kämpfen um dem Scheißekanal for the German version. Hood |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
lol
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Seriously though, whatever you think of the title I suggested, and I'm not saying it's great either (and I'm not trying defend it or 'sell' it here) , I think the logic and concept behind it is sound. I agree it doesn't really 'grab you' in the same sense that other less descriptive titles might, but I don't think it should be criticized for being too generic either. It's meant to be the overall name for a series of flight sims, not just one set in a particular kind of aircraft, or in the Battle of Britain, or even in WW2 (we already have a Korean War add-on announced). How is a more specific name going to look when the series gets as fleshed out as it probably will (rhetorical question)? Even something as generic as 'Combat Flight Simulator' might end up being too exclusive of the content that eventually gets included. BTW, it looked to me like the inclusion of that George Carlin video in your post was there to suggest AvSim+ is a more euphemistic title than 'Storm of War'. The thing is, AvSim+ isn't meant to describe the content of the sim, it's simply saying what the overall product is, it's an aviation sim. The plus bit could be considered euphemistic if you take it to refer only to the combat aspect of the content, but that's just one interpretation. The phrase 'storm of war' could actually be considered more euphemistic, even in the context of the original speech from which it was taken (ie. don't worry, those aren't bombs landing on your head, you're just in a storm of war...). Incidentally, I wouldn't call myself a fan, but I've watched a lot of George Carlin's video's in the past (including the one you posted) and agree with a lot of the things he said. Are you familiar with Bill Hicks' work, he had some strong things to say about advertizing (and other things) as well, in a similar sort of vein. Going to let this subject go now, have spent way too much time thinking about it. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|