![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
... I'll judge what "luxury" is 'right' for me, as will others judge for themselves. ... Signed..."Cranky Old Man" P.S. I'll probably only leave this post up for a day or so, then delete. EDITED: Last edited by DoolittleRaider; 11-10-2010 at 11:38 PM. Reason: Point was made...got that off my chest. thanks for listening.Now...back to the original theme of the thread. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Also, I'd be surprised if any current games even use more than 3 cores. Ditto on the graphics....this is the area where I'd be most cautious. I think there are subtle indications (speculation yes..) that nVidia may be the way to go with SOW. But Szala, your strategy of going for the absolute best (most expensive) on every level could well not be the best one - in that the extra expenditure over a more modest i7 say could be wasted. We really do need to learn a little more about how the game will respond to more cores versus clock speed, and just how CPU V GPU dependent it will be. Last edited by kendo65; 11-08-2010 at 10:16 AM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Apparently Intel has high hopes for Sandy Bridge!
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/san...-i7,11464.html Unless you need to upgrade now, I'ld put off the upgrade. Cheers! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another vote for:
Wait Unless you have to build now, wait until we know more. We don't yet know if BoB needs 6 cores to run at max (it might) - you may for example be better with a 4 core i7 or and AMD cpu, then spending more on the GC - with the amount you're spending, I'd think of going better than the 480, either 580 or 6xxx series, but again you need to wait to see what BoB wants. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
wow .. you do not normally see Intel saying things like that |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|