![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
View Poll Results: full real for SoW? | |||
Full real forced on everyone or I won't buy |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 1.82% |
Arcade forced on everyone of I won't buy |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 1.82% |
switches for everything, arcade default |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 14.55% |
Switches for everything, full real default |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
45 | 81.82% |
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What do I think? Daft questions. The poll result would be totally unrepresentative of the potential market for the sim. In any case, we don't know yet what the options will be.
And there is no such thing as a 'full real' simulation. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can I go for tailored settings? ie. the game asks you what your experience is, sets up basic rookie/experienced/veteran settings and then then you tweak away to fine tune.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our opinions are not relevant.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How about the option "Host's settings rule"? That's all that matters really. The settings will be adjustable and there'll be full-switchers and open cockpitters hosting, and all shades in between. What's to get upset about?
__________________
Another home-built rig: AMD FX 8350, liquid-cooled. Asus Sabretooth 990FX Rev 2.0 , 16 GB Mushkin Redline (DDR3-PC12800), Enermax 1000W PSU, MSI R9-280X 3GB GDDR5 2 X 128GB OCZ Vertex SSD, 1 x64GB Corsair SSD, 1x 500GB WD HDD. CH Franken-Tripehound stick and throttle merged, CH Pro pedals. TrackIR 5 and Pro-clip. Windows 7 64bit Home Premium. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't know, it was already started in here:
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...=16862&page=28 It kept rumbling on, someone suggested a thread, so I thought a poll might be a good idea. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() I didn't answer the poll. Unless you have been up there 5000 feet upside down, you are not even getting close. Even then, no one was shooting at you. Even then, no sim turns your chair upside down. Dumb argument (sorry). Spliter |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm expecring SoW to be a simulation... So full switch, but with options to turn it down for those who dont want/cant do it or dont have the time or will to learn. Like 75-ish % of il2 players.
![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
i want good ww2 simulation full real and all swichess arcade game me not interesting because is very simple and not real.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You know, the cool thing about a switches is the fact they have (at least) TWO positions: On AND Off.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The poll might be worded in a "dilemma forcing" manner so to speak, but it's good someone went up and posted it because we can actually see that most people are reasonable.
I didn't answer, but i think the results show that the community knows what's best for the genre and the series as a whole, instead of trying to force their preferences on others to the detriment of the series as far as sales are concerned. Just like IL-2, have switches for everything. In fact, that's how i would have worded the last two choices, merging them together. Difficulty options or helper tools for everything just like in IL2, then let the people choose what they want to fly in their single player missions or which servers to join depending on host settings. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|