Friday 2010-10-01 Dev. update and Discussion

[matsher]

[QUOTE=Tone71;186463]All things considered, I don't think it looks too bad:



@ Tree_UK
I think that the landscape looks great. I say this because in this reference pic from TONE71 you can clearly see that in the distance is a distinct haze. Which is very common, and looking at Olegs' Screenshot you can see the haze is present all the way to the shoreline.
In the above reference pic, the haze has burned off in the near distance. I fly a lot and I can vouch for the presence of this haze effect, which dampens and flattens the colour of the ground and skies... The ground is really very well rendered.

Also the above reference shot is also over saturated, it has way too much blue/cyan. You wanted others input about this concern of yours, so this
is mine.

I also want to tell you that its not your opinion that rubs people up the wrong way, its your delivery. Telling Oleg his landscapes look like a child painted them
or that Canon should or could fix up what (in your opinion) Oleg couldn't achieve cannot be viewed as criticism. Constructive or otherwise.
They are straight up insults...
If it was your intention to insult Oleg and his years of work, then congrats, you've achieved your goal. BUT if it wasn't your intent, then try and consider another approach. This is my opinion. Use it, Don't use it, you choose.