Is it worth for a TW fan?

[Rody]

Thanks alot Sneaksie & mitra,
I will check the Xfire group.
We will keep in touch

[JacquestheApostate]

I am a TW guy too. I just bought VIII Century yesterday because it looked pretty cool.

I think your going to see a lot more TW guys coming over here as time goes by.

I do think that 1C is making a marketing mistake by introducing Bordino and Napolean, they should be doing Rome or ancient if they want to make serious coin.

[Rody]

Originally Posted by JacquestheApostate

I am a TW guy too. I just bought VIII Century yesterday because it looked pretty cool.

I think your going to see a lot more TW guys coming over here as time goes by.

I do think that 1C is making a marketing mistake by introducing Bordino and Napolean, they should be doing Rome or ancient if they want to make serious coin.

I hope I can see more guys from TW coming here, to shock CA and then we will have real competition.
I agree with you, Napoleaonic & Amreican Civil War wont be good, since alot of developers are doing RTS based on that era, sticking in medieval era (with different campaigns) will be the best, also 14th to 16th century will be great, no much games touched this era, also as you said Ancient will be good.

[Sneaksie]

Originally Posted by JacquestheApostate

I do think that 1C is making a marketing mistake by introducing Bordino and Napolean, they should be doing Rome or ancient if they want to make serious coin.

Uhm, what we are making? We didn't announce any games about Napoleonic era so far.

[JacquestheApostate]

Originally Posted by Sneaksie

Uhm, what we are making? We didn't announce any games about Napoleonic era so far.

Yes you did, I know I read it.

I think it's in the pdf you guys have for download.

Thanks for replying too btw.

[mitra]

Originally Posted by JacquestheApostate

Yes you did, I know I read it.

I think it's in the pdf you guys have for download.

Thanks for replying too btw.

The pdf is not official but is mine (i'm not work for 1C). Many things regarding the game future you see here (the pdf is older than 1 year) are old info I derived unofficially by russian forums using google translator.

[Brigadier Graham]

Originally Posted by Sneaksie

Uhm, what we are making? We didn't announce any games about Napoleonic era so far.

Personally I wouldn't mind if you did a Napoleonic era real time strategy game.. I would certainly be up to try it sir.

[mitra]

The series description speak of "from middles ages to modern time" so I suppose, if the series go well the last step can be the napoleonic ages. Personally I will prefer the pike and musket period: from Renaissance to 30 years war

[Rody]

Originally Posted by mitra

The series description speak of "from middles ages to modern time" so I suppose, if the series go well the last step can be the napoleonic ages. Personally I will prefer the pike and musket period: from Renaissance to 30 years war

Yes that what officialy is described in 1c page for the series.
But I hope they will release many games for middle ages before moving to next era.
I was thinking that if they make several expansions for Real Warfare 2, so first we will have Northern Crusade, other expansions will be Holy lands, next one will be Mongol Invasion and so on (all in 13th century) and multiplayer will be common for all those expansion means you can play all factions in multiplayer battles.
Next they can release RW 3 with renaissance era and so on

Just dreaming

[JacquestheApostate]

I would prefer Ancient China myself.