![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Our president will not intervene. Our military is spread too thin already. We've told the Taliban and Al Qeada how long they have to hang on until we are gone from Afghanistan. Our president just gave a victory speech for Iraq without using the word "victory". We can't even secure our own borders. We are about $13 Trillion USD in debt which is several degrees beyond broke. We are one step behind Britain (heck, we just mimicked their healthcare system...). Ya'll are on your own anyway, just the way you wanted it. If something big happens we'll try to sit it out. Splitter |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Peace, through eternal vigilence. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Obama already stated publicly he thinks Argentina deserves the Falklands...... |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The Falklands remain British sovereign territory. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Or is this something invented by the 'Obama is a Moslem' crowd? And can anyone explain how a thread about Vulcans ended up being hijacked yet again by the NeoCon 'we can save the world from tyranny' bunch? Are they so insecure that they can't look at an internet forum without spouting their revisionist gloop? Tiresome... |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
“We are aware not only of the current situation but also of the history, but our position remains one of neutrality,” a State Department spokesman told The Times. “The US recognizes de facto UK administration of the islands but takes no position on the sovereignty claims of either party.”
Hilary Clinton, our secretary of state, has said Argentina and Britain should sit down and negotiate the fate of the Falklands. And the Obama administration refused to back Britain at the UN regarding the Falklands. An assistant Secretary of State prefers to call the islands the "Malvinas". So...ya'll might just lose the islands through a UN resolution. No fighting required unless you buck the UN. This stance by the administration is probably an attempt to curry favor with Central and South American countries. Throwing an ally with whom we are supposed to have a 'special relationship" under the bus? Sure, but we want the world to like us now. You can't count on the US unless things change over here. Our enemies know this and our allies are figuring it out. Dutch: I know it's not everyone. There are still realistic people scattered throughout the world lol. But then again, there are a bunch of people in the world who like seeing the US get a black eye. Many quietly snickered after 9/11 and believe that this nation brought those attacks on itself. Heck, there is even a group of people here that believe the attacks were perpetrated by the US government (cause Bush was so evil). While we as a nation are sometimes misguided, we are not an evil people....so those attitudes are frustrating. Really, all we hear about is how unpopular the US is around the world. BTW, I have no doubt about the "fight" that lays beneath the British facades. That same resilience that brought you all through the Battle of Britain is still there, just lying dormant Splitter Last edited by Splitter; 09-11-2010 at 05:20 AM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|