Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2010, 10:32 AM
julian265 julian265 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 195
Default

What's stopping freetrack from using reflectors?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2010, 10:38 AM
albx albx is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 716
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by julian265 View Post
What's stopping freetrack from using reflectors?
probably because you need to have a light pointing to your face?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2010, 10:47 AM
julian265 julian265 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albx View Post
probably because you need to have a light pointing to your face?
You can't see IR
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2010, 11:12 AM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

It doesn't matter whether you can see IR or not. What matters is that reflectors need something to reflect.

The trackIR camera has a built in emitter, so it's both an emitter and a receiver. Freetrack cameras however mostly function as receivers only, because they lack built-in LEDs.
MSPaint to the rescue:

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2010, 12:24 PM
julian265 julian265 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 195
Default

Yes I'm aware of how it works - but what's stopping you from buying some IR LED's (the same as I use on my headset), positioning them near your camera and pointing at you, and using the same sort of reflective material as TIR does to reflect the light back to the camera?

Most freetrack users make their own system anyway, so is there anything that I'm missing that's stopping them from doing it this way? It's easier to do with regard to avoiding extra wires running to your head.

Last edited by julian265; 08-17-2010 at 12:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2010, 01:22 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Yup, if you position LEDs near the camera i think there's nothing stopping you from using reflectors.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-17-2010, 03:10 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt View Post
Yup, if you position LEDs near the camera i think there's nothing stopping you from using reflectors.
There are (standard)webcams with integrated IR LEDs on the market.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2010, 01:46 PM
albx albx is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 716
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by julian265 View Post
You can't see IR
i was talking about normal light, not IR... and probably IR direct to your eyes is more dangerous than the normal light

Last edited by albx; 08-17-2010 at 01:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-17-2010, 04:01 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swiss View Post
There are (standard)webcams with integrated IR LEDs on the market.
Didn't know that, you learn something new every day here


Quote:
Originally Posted by albx View Post
and probably IR direct to your eyes is more dangerous than the normal light
Actually i think it's not. IR, visible light, lasers, radio waves, it's all the same thing. What changes are the frequencies/wavelengths, which is also a measure of the energy each beam carries.

Higher frequencies means shorter wavelengths and higher energies. That's why in the 40s most radios were short-wave radios...the beam had enough energy to travel far, scatter across the top portions of the atmosphere and then come back down on another part of the continent, so that the resistance fighters in occupied europe could listen to BBC for coded messages

In all this, IR ranks below the visible light in the amount of energy it carries. In that sense, looking directly into your TrackIR LEDs is less harmful than looking at the sky and certainly harmless when compared to other higher frequency devices we carry on us or spend time around every day (like for example a 2.4Ghz wireless router).

Not playing smart**s here, i just wouldn't want people to be scared of using head tracking when it makes such a big difference
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-17-2010, 04:11 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt View Post
Didn't know that, you learn something new every day here
Night Vison webcam rings a bell?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.