Patch 4.10 - Development Updates by Daidalos Team

[Friendly_flyer]

Thanks!

Are those new buildings I see in the backround?

[_1SMV_Gitano]

Originally Posted by Friendly_flyer

Are those new buildings I see in the backround?

Slovakia map, 4.09m

[76.IAP-Blackbird]

Hi, I can remember some Nightfighter videos you have posted a while ago, and everybody knows there is the Grumman incident, but how is it with the P-61, it was build by Northrop.
Today it`s one company, but they don`t own the military designation for their birds. Do I see it right and would be the 61 a nice lady for pacific theaters Nighthunting scenarios?

[bf-110]

Can´t wait to fly the Re.2000. (want to fly the 2002 too,and maybe more than the 2000).

Gonna see the Hs-129.Can it be used for heavy fighter role?

[csThor]

P-61 is subject to "the Grumman thingy". Which means it's not for TD.

[Tempest123]

Why are FsX developers allowed to use "Grumman" ect. trademarks? Shame for Il2

[Friendly_flyer]

Originally Posted by csThor

P-61 is subject to "the Grumman thingy". Which means it's not for TD.

Aw, too bad.

[DanLewis]

Are we getting the Italian or Hungarian versions of the RE2000? As I remember it, the Italians weren't fond of it so it mainly went to Hungary and Sweden - with Hungary changing out the engine and armament. It's the latter I'm interested in - an RE2000 without the Breda popguns.

[FlyingShark]

Originally Posted by csThor

P-61 is subject to "the Grumman thingy". Which means it's not for TD.

Sorry if this has been covered before but what exactly is "the Grumman thingy"?

~S~

[brando]

Originally Posted by FlyingShark

Sorry if this has been covered before but what exactly is "the Grumman thingy"?

~S~

A copyright issue which reared its head quite a few years ago. Discussion and speculation about it are not encouraged, 'nuff said.

B