Don't have Men of war...but have a question.

[Evilsausage]

Don't be so sure that Germany would had ruled the world. Yes with UK out of the picture USSR would have had it even harder.
But Germany was struggeling with Stalingrad, Just think about how hard it would be to capture Moscow.

Soviet had already moved there important factories far away from the frontlines. Beginning to produce more and more equipment.
The war might had been a few years longer but i do think Soviet would had won anyway.
Germany could't match Soviet in terms of production and manpower, even if there factories did't get bombed by the brits/USA.

[KnightFandragon]

Originally Posted by Evilsausage

Don't be so sure that Germany would had ruled the world. Yes with UK out of the picture USSR would have had it even harder.
But Germany was struggeling with Stalingrad, Just think about how hard it would be to capture Moscow.

Soviet had already moved there important factories far away from the frontlines. Beginning to produce more and more equipment.
The war might had been a few years longer but i do think Soviet would had won anyway.
Germany could't match Soviet in terms of production and manpower, even if there factories did't get bombed by the brits/USA.

Is this asuming Japan was also not in the war? Im sure if us/uk werent in it then Japan woulda taken what they wanted in the pacific then attacked Russia from their side and Germany from the other making Russia fight a 2 front war. With Japanese not fightiing in the pacific they coulda put in more production into better tanks and better supplied thier men to give the RUssians a tougher fight, meanwhile with Germany not fighting a 3 front war in Italy, France and Russia they coulda put more time and manpower into making mroe Tiger's, Panthers, fixing the flaws in their 262s and making the King Tiger more mechanically reliable. Meanwhile the Russians prolly woulda been on a 2 front war and it woulda been thier factories being bombed by im sure both sides and they woulda had a harder time mass producing thos T34s and research woulda been harder for them so im sure the IS2 wouldnt have come as soon. The Germans woulda taken the oil or w/e it was they were after in Africa so supply wouldnt have been a problem so much for them. Then they woulda also been able to produce more of those STG 44's giving thier squads better firepower against the mass Russian charges.

[Korsakov829]

Russian tanks and much of their other equipment was manufactured in the Urals, well hidden and fortified.

[Nikitns]

OOOPS: SORRY!!

It was 6,8 MILLION SOVIET KIA (not 7.8!) Vs 4,3 million AXIS KIA!!!

[Korsakov829]

Such losses must come with every great victory.

[TodaysKiller]

Originally Posted by Evilsausage

Don't be so sure that Germany would had ruled the world. Yes with UK out of the picture USSR would have had it even harder.
But Germany was struggeling with Stalingrad, Just think about how hard it would be to capture Moscow.

Soviet had already moved there important factories far away from the frontlines. Beginning to produce more and more equipment.
The war might had been a few years longer but i do think Soviet would had won anyway.
Germany could't match Soviet in terms of production and manpower, even if there factories did't get bombed by the brits/USA.

True about taking over moscow, would be really hard...but Millions of casualties would of resulted imo even if the USSR did end up winning...Would be devistating for both sides.