Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > Men of War

Men of War New World War II strategy game

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-29-2010, 03:24 AM
Evilsausage Evilsausage is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 89
Default

Well i have heard the Penetrations will be changed in the expansions but to tell the truth i kinda like the penetration as it is.
Since the game doesnt have real life weapon ranges. They had to scale down the penetration accordingly to the range aswell. Like 10 meter = 100 meters etc..
Also do we really want King Tigers to become even better? Since people are already whining that they are OP.


Then again havent played Assault squad. The penetration changes might be better then it is now.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-29-2010, 03:31 AM
KnightFandragon KnightFandragon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KRL HQ, Ontario Canada
Posts: 740
Default

Since this game isnt realistic to real life then atleast make it play balanced where the Germans arent as inaccurate as a 2 yer old w/ a Mp40 and the Americans arent pintpoint accurate. Next I hate the fact that tanks have to kiss stuff to kill it,...increase penetration atleast a few meters.......next make the ligher stuff a little bit more appealing to use...as is now its just free points...atleast German stuff is, the 50 and DSHK just kill it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-29-2010, 02:07 PM
Evilsausage Evilsausage is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 89
Default

Thing is if we change the weapon ranges alot of other stuff has to be changed aswell. Like longer view distance for all the units and also all the maps need to become bigger.
A map like Workshop is already very smal and you can shoot through a large part of it.
Fields of Honor Mod Has a longer range on all the equipment, it was cool in a way but can't really say the gameplay got much better.
Be Greatfull MoW dosn't got CoH weapon ranges


But i have to agree about the 50 cals and DKSHs.
Had a game where a King tiger Assaulted my IS-3.
Knowing that the king tiger could't get killed frontaly it moved very close in for the kill on my detracked IS-3. So i starded firing my DKSH detracking both tracks and causing the KT to turn as it was moving, Showing its side to my IS-3.
Then i could just simply shoot the KT in the side. Hillarious stuff.

Anyway 50 cals and DKSHs maybe should have abit lower penetration at long ranges...and less effectivness vs Tracks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-29-2010, 02:10 PM
Crni vuk Crni vuk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 185
Default

realisticaly speaking those heavy machineguns should have almost zero chance of detracking vehicles. Well medium and heavy tanks at least.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-29-2010, 03:58 PM
KnightFandragon KnightFandragon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KRL HQ, Ontario Canada
Posts: 740
Default

Exactly, those heavy's should outrange the 30cals and should beable to punch through walls and cover with a decent amount of rounds but not so easily be able to destroy light armor and tracks. Its possible to Destroy a Panzer IV from the rear at close range w/ shots to its engine w/ a DHSK or 50..thats totally retard-o. The Axis light armor isnt used b/c a clown on a 50 can shred it in 2 rounds or less...true story. Also, the 50 and DSHK shouldnt beinfantry useable...its to big and kicks to much to fire like a Light MG such as the Mg42 or Browning 30cal. Maybe in Assault Squad or something make Armor Piercing 50 cal rounds as an ammo option in the vehicle inventory but give the thing like 1 box or so of it. Then make them so they take quite a few rounds to destroy light armor then we'd be making sense of a deadly 50cal like it is now. Also, in GSM FOH2....there are smoke shells for tanks...those totally need to be in a version of MoW.....those would basically complete the awesomeness of MoW, you could then do Armor/Infantry assaults w/ smoke shells as cover and advancing behind tanks. W/O the 50cal being an Anti Everything gun the Germans could do thier Blitzkreig w/ 251s and light stuff. Would add more excite ment to the game, as is right now this game is cool but its kinda like every other RTS, 2 lines of Defense just duking it out till one side wins, rarely is there any cool manuvers people do....M4 SHerman Charge doesnt count =P
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-29-2010, 02:06 PM
Crni vuk Crni vuk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilsausage View Post
Well i have heard the Penetrations will be changed in the expansions but to tell the truth i kinda like the penetration as it is.
Since the game doesnt have real life weapon ranges. They had to scale down the penetration accordingly to the range aswell. Like 10 meter = 100 meters etc..
Also do we really want King Tigers to become even better? Since people are already whining that they are OP.


Then again havent played Assault squad. The penetration changes might be better then it is now.
I agree simply throwing in realistic numbers, penetrations and ranges for the vehicles will not make the game more fun as long the maps do not support the range acordingly. Thoug playing eventualy on maps with 20km distances might not be the best part well not yet who knows in a few years what will come. But for now it will be just more frustrating for anyone not playing Germans. Hands down they had the most powerfull anti tank guns in service which could without much issues destroy almost any vehicle even with long range.

But it is nice to hear that they eventualy plan to tweak it here a bit cause it always feels strange to have the SU 100 for example get pretty close to score a sucesfull hit on medium tanks already. Or same for the Jagdpanther and most important the Nashorn is almost completely useless that way. It will be almost always spoted before you can get a shoot and as soon you do shoot and miss or dont destroy the target with your first shoot its toast. Not very usefull for a tank hunter. Particuilarly situations where you can get a clear shoot to the side of the vehicle should show much more effect. Its already hard enough to get in the flank of the enemy. Why even punished further with it that you have to spend sometimes 3 or 4 shoots before you can bring the target down ... of course I am talking about a hit not a miss. To many times you see shoots do nothing even when they hit. And a T34 should realy have no issue to penetrate the Panthers side. Not even the 76 should have here already issues.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-29-2010, 04:08 PM
KnightFandragon KnightFandragon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KRL HQ, Ontario Canada
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crni vuk View Post
I agree simply throwing in realistic numbers, penetrations and ranges for the vehicles will not make the game more fun as long the maps do not support the range acordingly. Thoug playing eventualy on maps with 20km distances might not be the best part well not yet who knows in a few years what will come. But for now it will be just more frustrating for anyone not playing Germans. Hands down they had the most powerfull anti tank guns in service which could without much issues destroy almost any vehicle even with long range.
Dont make ranges 20Km, just keep the ranges as is, 150m range is fine..what is lame is that 150m nothing can kill anything. Dont make the game realistic to where the Germans are one shotting everything, this game isnt realistic so playbalance it. Find a base number and make the Germans a touch bit better, the Americans meh and the Russian 76 short barrels a bit worse. The 85s and 90s were as good but still not as deadly at long ranges like the German guns. This game could be play balanced a bit better. As is now the US stuff is pin point accurate even on the move, the Germans even touch the gas pedal the hit circle gets as big as a house. Even the Japanese tanks are more accurate then Germans..true story. The Germans in this game shouldnt be the overpowering god army they were just a bit better, prolly like the US tank accuracy is now......make the US and UK about as accurate as the King Tiger is now, that thing is nice. Then make the Russians a bit worse then that. Every nation should be moving Jagdtiger accurate on the move. There wasnt computer operated Gyro stabilization and stuff so hitting on the move didnt happen that much cuz it was like just tossing a shell out the hatch, your gunna miss anywho....Also, when is the Tiger going to get a new front bumper? Its got that "penetrable by everything" front bumper like the Pzr VI B King Tiger.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-29-2010, 05:07 PM
Crni vuk Crni vuk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 185
Default

"... US stuff is pin point accurate even on the move, the Germans even touch the gas pedal the hit circle gets as big as a house ..."

Stabilized Guns for Yanks' Tanks

Germans didnt used them ever in any of their vehicles except for rumors about the Panther II geting them. But its not even sure if there has been ever a runing prototype.

While those stabiliziations in WW2 have been not even close to what they are today ~ an abrahams has no issue to hit a target 2000meters away while driving full speed, they could give you some advantage while stoping and starting.

Though I havnt noticed much difference in accuracy between guns except for the super long range weapons like the 90mm or 88mm.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-30-2010, 02:14 AM
KnightFandragon KnightFandragon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KRL HQ, Ontario Canada
Posts: 740
Default

That stabilizer is neat =D
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.