![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, about progression... Newer (SOW) isn't always better. Graphically SOW looks nice, for sure, just like my IL2 1946 install does. Although my specs are high enough for SOW, i will surely stick to IL2 1946, if playability isn't improved in SOW. By the way, as soon as SOW is released, we have so much more modded aircraft in IL2, we don't play SOW anyway!
Team Daidalos, thanks for making this sim even better after all those years! Last edited by Hawker17; 04-11-2010 at 08:45 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
However, modded Il-2 is timeless, and I think I will always be playing it until SoW has all the planes that Il-2 has |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
i really hope that the change from il2 to SoW is the change from a simulation game to a simulation!
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I for one can not wait till SOW comes out, because mods have killed the online community. Maybe 'killed' isn't the right word, but changed it dramatically from what it once was. With SOW we will once again have a single game version for all to fly on. Quote:
Overall, hats off to TD for bringing us the long overdue fixes. Now if only the AI team killing gunners fix gets included in the 4.10...
__________________
LEVEL BOMBING MANUAL v2.0 | Dedicated Bomber Squadron 'MUSTANG' - compilation of online air victories |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
This, many times over. And I really believe that once we see SoW, that IL2/46 will look and feel like the old, outdated, game it really is now.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
S!
Caspar, I understand the spirit of consistency in the cockpits. But even in the stock game there is so much difference between them. Take Tempest which is a true work of art and then for example Bf109 or Mig-3 or IL-2. They are old and it shows, in fact they have not changed since beginning. So a souping up would do fine don't you think..and of course done within the IL-2 parameters. As of games being sloppily programmed and using more resources and all that is a trend. Why bother optimizing when people can buy relatively cheap new hardware? And it is not very cost effective for a company to invest too much time in this kind of stuff. Oleg might be one of the few doing so, but he is in the toughest of all genres IMO: flight sims. Realistically thinking you can not cater for everyone. An average computer today is above the minimum specs of IL-2. The very small minority might be in the low end just at the edge of running it. Again the superduper computers some enthusiasts have do not make IL-2 any better than it is..so seeing your point in this Thanks for the replies TD, very much appreciated |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What i didn't liked about BoB II - Wov, were the crash landings and the spinning screen. I liked the atmophere in Jane's WWII fighters very much, maybe you know that (early) game? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I haven't played Jane's game, but I am aware of the features that BoB2 lacks. Il-2 damage model is beautiful and if paired with BoB2 could make one great sim. I am looking at SoW as being the start of something great
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have to thank TD for taking on the issue of the Ju88. It was in dire need and you guys delivered. Hats up to you.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Seconded. Great work, TD.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|