Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-05-2010, 04:41 AM
airmalik airmalik is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 150
Default

Great story!

My instructor told me about the time when he took off almost like a helicopter in a strong headwind. I don't think he landed behind the spot he took off from though.

A few weeks ago I was flying into a stiff headwind and tried to see if I could go backwards. My ultralight stalls at 29-30mph. I tried to hold it just above 30mph and looking down I could see myself hovering over the same spot for a while. It seemed like I was going backwards at times but I couldn't be sure. The slowest ground speed my GPS displayed was 9mph. It took me a few moments to realize it was backwards!

cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2010, 10:29 AM
Azimech's Avatar
Azimech Azimech is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Leerdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 428
Default

The Antonov An-2 is famous for being able to do this. Not only that, it's stall characteristics are a real life saver.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2010, 11:11 AM
PeterPanPan PeterPanPan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 559
Default

Talking of wind assisted take-offs and landings, you have to see this video of a Twin Otter landing in a very strong head wind. Incredible ...



PPanPan
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-05-2010, 08:40 PM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

He he, when I was 16 and taking my glider license back in 1986 we had to do a tow from a nearby field where we had been flying on a "camp" for a week even though it was a storm. Both my teacher and the tow pilot where 60+ and had thousands of hours and said it would be good practice for me as an apprentice I have in my logbook with the entry:

1986-07-12, 50 min, Bergfalke 2/55 "Towed from boras in 90 km/h headwind at 700m, tow speed was 135 so it took ages! Landing circuit was performed by reducing speed to 70 km/h and reversing to end of field at 500m. Then fix the shadow at 90 km/h and descend until the ground effect caused a very unpleasant speed drop while still not moving relative to ground. Stick forward to get relative speed and landing with a roll out of maybe 20 meters..."

This was a school flight (my 14:th start) and my teacher who started flying in 1935 told me stories from the finnish winter war where they hovered the biplanes down on lakes in a similar manner. Reduce speed until the shadow does not move and be prepared to apply throttle when the ground effect kicks in...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-05-2010, 09:41 PM
RAF74_Winger RAF74_Winger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 46
Default

Good stuff Mazek, I assume that by ground effect you mean the transition into the slower moving air close to the ground, is that correct?

W.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-06-2010, 12:11 AM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAF74_Winger View Post
Good stuff Mazek, I assume that by ground effect you mean the transition into the slower moving air close to the ground, is that correct?

W.
Yeah - using english terms I actually mixed it up, what I meant was the wind gradient and not the ground effect (the ground effect beeing the "floatiness" close to the ground produced by the pillow of over pressurized air under the wing and the wind gradient beeing the fact that the wind is a lot weaker close to the ground due to turbulence). The wind gradient is always present in wind and can be quite nasty in strong wind for rookie pilots coming in to slow. Suddenly you can lose 20-30 km/h of air speed while the ground speed remains the same. In this case it was extreme
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-06-2010, 12:27 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

In the days when I used to fly radio-controlled gliders this effect was very noticable - probably because their airspeed was low compared to a full-sized aircraft. In a strong wind the safest way to land was to push the nose down as you came below about 10-15 ft, and then level off about a foot off the ground to bleed off speed. Trying to maintain a constant airspeed was asking for trouble as you could only do this by diving, which put you into slower air, so you had to dive some more. I should imagine real glider pilots have the same difficulties too.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.