Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-17-2010, 05:20 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ok, my definition of an 'in game shot' is a screen shot taken from within a working game, Now there are a lot of folk on here who believe the sim is 98% finished and will be released in a couple of months time. Oleg himseld said he would show 'in game shots', not WIP's from september last year. At least we agree that it wont be released within a few months. And stop being so aggressive I've not insulted you. 'in game' means within the game not 'within unfinished game'. It really is self explanitary

Last edited by Tree_UK; 01-17-2010 at 05:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-17-2010, 05:31 PM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
Ok, my definition of an 'in game shot' is a screen shot taken from within a working game, Now there are a lot of folk on here who believe the sim is 98% finished and will be released in a couple of months time. Oleg himseld said he would show in agame shots, not WIP's from september last year. At least we agree that it wont be released within a few months. And stop being so aggressive I've not insulted you. 'in game' means within the game not 'within unfinished game'. It really is self explanitary
Really? How many people would agree with that definition? For me, 'in game' just means in the game engine rather than in the development tools. Like it does to anyone else who's ever followed the development of a game before. Go onto any forums for a game that's in development and say "when are you going to post in-game screenshots" about a game in production and you'll get the same response as you do here. The only difference between MG and the majority of other developers is that they're willing to post screenshots from a much earlier stage in the game's development. And no, I don't think the game's gonna be released in two months' time or that it's 98% complete like the majority of people here.
I just question why you post here, to be honest Tree. You come here, post something negative and completely unconstructive, reply to people's responses with something trite, incorrect and patronising, and then repeat. Why don't you just do something else like go to the pub or watch TV? Seriously. Do you just get a massive kick out of being a wanker?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-17-2010, 05:42 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I post what my opinion is, which I am entitled to do under the rules of this forum. If you read my original post, I was neither being negative or insulting, I was posting 'my view'. Calling me a 'wanker' is being insulting, and does not justify your argument. It does however make you seem less educated.

This being my original posts that seems to have upset everyone, a post which you yourself have just agreed with, it seems that it is you who is being negative towards me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
I dont see any evidance that SOW is 98% finished, I would say more 50%, If it were truly nearly finished we would be seeing some proper video footage of waves of heinkels escorted by 109's heading across the channel or something like. Get real guys, this is still a way off yet.

Last edited by Tree_UK; 01-17-2010 at 05:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-17-2010, 05:44 PM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
I post what my opinion is, which I am entitled to do under the rules of this forum. If you read my original post, I was neither being negative or insulting, I was posting 'my view'. Calling me a 'wanker' is being insulting, and does not justify your argument. It does however make you seem less educated.
Oh, God, I'm so ashamed that someone who repeatedly gets banned for trolling a game forum believes I'm less educated for stating my opinion of them. I see hundreds of people doing what you do all across the breadth of the internet, trolling around everywhere and calling it their 'opinion'. In any case, my calling you a wanker doesn't make your argument any more justified, does it? Go and post on another forum for a game in development asking when they're going to release in-game screenshots. Go on, try it. Post the results here. I want to see.

Last edited by TheGrunch; 01-17-2010 at 05:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-17-2010, 05:48 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have been banned once, for the record. And you should be ashamed, I have never called anyone on here a wanker.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-17-2010, 05:53 PM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
I have been banned once, for the record. And you should be ashamed, I have never called anyone on here a wanker.
I haven't called anyone on here a wanker before today. But you were banned then. It's just a word, Tree. Anyway, are you going to try what I suggest?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-17-2010, 05:59 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I would rather you justify how the post I made below makes me (a) A prick (B) A wanker and (C) whining and negative, when only a moment ago you just agreed with it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
I dont see any evidance that SOW is 98% finished, I would say more 50%, If it were truly nearly finished we would be seeing some proper video footage of waves of heinkels escorted by 109's heading across the channel or something like. Get real guys, this is still a way off yet.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-17-2010, 06:22 PM
Specht Specht is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
I have been banned once, for the record. And you should be ashamed, I have never called anyone on here a wanker.
And I seriously hope it was not the last time.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-17-2010, 06:35 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Specht View Post
And I seriously hope it was not the last time.
Happy new year specht, it should be a good one for you on that 'band wagon'.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-17-2010, 06:38 PM
proton45's Avatar
proton45 proton45 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 651
Default

LOL....oh boy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.