Friday 2010-01-15 Screenshots AND Discussion Thread

[kendo65]

Originally Posted by 13th Hsqn Protos

S~! Luthier

Pros: Good Attention to detail

Cons: Washed out low poly look as usual (stop this crap), over-weathered, dull .... this is not 2010 quality ....

Conclusion: Looks like IL2 ......

Would be nice if you could get over your WoP is better than BOB fixation long enough to see what is in front of your eyes.

How can you look at Pics 4, 5 and 6 and say that?

[Necrobaron]

Originally Posted by kendo65

Would be nice if you could get over your WoP is better than BOB fixation long enough to see what is in front of your eyes.

How can you look at Pics 4, 5 and 6 and say that?

Some of us are too fixated on oversaturated, whiz-bang graphics to know what a good sim even is, I suspect. Even if SoW looked like IL-2 (which it almost certainly will not), it would hardly be the end of the world. Just as long as the flight modelling, damage modelling, and all the other things that go on behind the scenes (and thus what makes a sim a sim) are improved accordingly, I will be happy.
________
Yamaha gladiator history

:

Originally Posted by Necrobaron

Some of us are too fixated on oversaturated, whiz-bang graphics to know what a good sim even is, I suspect. Even if SoW looked like IL-2 (which it almost certainly will not), it would hardly be the end of the world. Just as long as the flight modelling, damage modelling, and all the other things that go on behind the scenes (and thus what makes a sim a sim) are improved accordingly, I will be happy.

YourOlegs Ideal customer.

[Necrobaron]

Haha! I guess so. It's the guts of the sim that really matter. Cutting edge graphics are just icing on the cake.

Originally Posted by Tree_UK

:

YourOlegs Ideal customer.

________
New Mexico Medical Marijuana Dispensary

[=815=TooCooL]

Looks good and super detail but it seems like IL-2 mod to me.
Hope we could see actual flight video soon.

[bolox]

a couple of points on the instruments- several are of a later than 1942 style- presumably from 'restoration'

asi is wrong AFAIK

dh asi


pre 42 'white' was used not flourescent green- a similar type to what you have used looks like this

1946 date is a repair date marking

turn and slip indicator
again green indicates post '42

early pattern


detail on centre of this later one might be of use?


compass
you are using a later p11 type- noticeable from the 'T' shape course indicator- should be 2 parallel lines for ~40

note also the way cardinal points are marked- square red base for north
this also applies to spits/ hurri's
the larger 'bomber type' compass has a triangular red north


altimeter
also has green numbers- should be all 'white'

[mazex]

Originally Posted by bolox

a couple of points on the instruments- several are of a later than 1942 style- presumably from 'restoration'

asi is wrong AFAIK

dh asi

pre 42 'white' was used not flourescent green- a similar type to what you have used looks like this

1946 date is a repair date marking

turn and slip indicator
again green indicates post '42

early pattern


detail on centre of this later one might be of use?


compass
you are using a later p11 type- noticeable from the 'T' shape course indicator- should be 2 parallel lines for ~40

note also the way cardinal points are marked- square red base for north
this also applies to spits/ hurri's
the larger 'bomber type' compass has a triangular red north


altimeter
also has green numbers- should be all 'white'

I love it... If I where Oleg, I'd put you on my list that gets on the beta team and a free copy of the game for doing the instrument research for them