Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-20-2009, 04:49 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

Fantastic ! Our SoW is in 3rd position behind a couple of space games, which will be 100% forgotten 6 months later ... not even material for the 5 € bins ... that's the difference, if SoW will be as good as Il2, it will last for years to come. The other games will last 6 months max.

Regards,
Insuber
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-20-2009, 06:22 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Are you satisfied now, Tanner, that you brought us back to earth???
Do you really think anybody, besides you, wanted to read that???
Of course there are more people interested in games than in simulation-games.
Also for shure there are more people interested in quantity than quality.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects

Last edited by robtek; 12-20-2009 at 06:26 PM. Reason: additional thougts
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-20-2009, 07:29 PM
Abbeville-Boy Abbeville-Boy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanner View Post
You are delusional if you don't think that Mass Effect 2 and Starcraft II will be far better in quality than BoB. Both games have the backing of major games publishers with far more dollars, development staff, and technological advancements and developments than some minor independent Russian developer. We are talking about BioWare and Blizzard here. They both have more money and more experience than Maddox games will ever have.

When Martin Sheen starts doing voice work for SOW, you might be able to make such an argument as quality over quantity, but as the score stands now you can fully expect Mass Effect 2 and Starcraft II to win in both those categories.

You wanna support the minor flight sim genre? Go buy some. Voting on some online poll don't mean a thing.


you can't know that untill you own it
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-20-2009, 07:35 PM
nearmiss nearmiss is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanner View Post
You are delusional if you don't think that Mass Effect 2 and Starcraft II will be far better in quality than BoB. Both games have the backing of major games publishers with far more dollars, development staff, and technological advancements and developments than some minor independent Russian developer. We are talking about BioWare and Blizzard here. They both have more money and more experience than Maddox games will ever have.

When Martin Sheen starts doing voice work for SOW, you might be able to make such an argument as quality over quantity, but as the score stands now you can fully expect Mass Effect 2 and Starcraft II to win in both those categories.

You wanna support the minor flight sim genre? Go buy some. Voting on some online poll don't mean a thing.
It is a simple Poll..


Last edited by nearmiss; 12-20-2009 at 07:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-21-2009, 01:33 AM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanner View Post
You are delusional if you don't think that Mass Effect 2 and Starcraft II will be far better in quality than BoB.
That depends on what you mean by 'quality', doesn't it? Sure, they might LOOK better, but that's probably it. Starcraft particularly, what a hilariously overrated game. It's almost as overrated as World of Warcraft. Blizzard games are based around creating addiction, and Bioware like producing games where you're either the most evil person in the world or a saint, which is a gimmick that has become quite overused. I have to qualify that by mentioning that nevertheless I enjoyed Mass Effect, but I probably won't play it through again. Anyway, basically I find it especially amusing that you're using voice acting pedigree or the presence of Hollywood-style production values to decide on the 'quality' of a game, especially considering the steaming piles that were Oblivion and Assassin's Creed respectively.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-21-2009, 02:23 AM
fuzzychickens fuzzychickens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanner View Post
You are delusional if you don't think that Mass Effect 2 and Starcraft II will be far better in quality than BoB. Both games have the backing of major games publishers with far more dollars, development staff, and technological advancements and developments than some minor independent Russian developer. We are talking about BioWare and Blizzard here. They both have more money and more experience than Maddox games will ever have.

When Martin Sheen starts doing voice work for SOW, you might be able to make such an argument as quality over quantity, but as the score stands now you can fully expect Mass Effect 2 and Starcraft II to win in both those categories.

You wanna support the minor flight sim genre? Go buy some. Voting on some online poll don't mean a thing.
Wow, great logic. More dollars plus hollywood voice actors = higher quality.
Comparing quality btw a RTS, a 3rd person shooter and a WWII flight sim is silly in itself too. No one is delusional voting for SOW. The track record of the developer delivering one of the greatest flight sims of all time is reason enough for SOW to be a voting option.

You also fail considering another sim that came out right after IL2 with far more money and resources completely failed to deliver a sim anywhere close to IL2's quality.

Also, the developers behind Starcraft II and Mass Effect 2 couldn't deliver a sim as good as the nearly 10 year old IL2 if they decided to develop one. They don't have the knowledge and resources needed to make an accurate WWII simulator.

They could make a WWII GAME, but not a simulator that could compete with the detail, accuracy, and realism that Maddox games will achieve. It's already proven by other developers trying to compete with far more money and resources and failing big time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-21-2009, 03:01 AM
AdMan AdMan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oleg's ignore list
Posts: 247
Default

I'll probably play a few of the games on this list including ME2 and Deus Ex 3, but I don't think I've anticipated a game as much as SOW, waiting so long for this thing to be done.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-21-2009, 06:47 AM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanner View Post
Wake up, folks. You are in the smallest of minorities. No one has heard of this game. No one will ever hear of this game, but a very select few in the PC gaming market. SOW:BOB is being anticipated by no one. The sooner you can come to terms with that, the better.
Do you know what? Good. That's the way we like it. If we had to deal with hordes of the kind of idiots who buy World of Warcraft and its expansion packs on these forums, I'd probably stop reading them. How many sales does The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky have compared to Harry Potter? Your comparisons are pathetic. Guess what the best-selling item in PC and Video Games on Amazon UK is at the moment? Oh, wow, it's Wii Fit Plus with Balance Board! That must be an incredible game!
Anyway, why do you care? We're not 'patting ourselves on the back' for 'subverting' a poll. We're just supporting this game, demonstrating our appreciation. Maybe if it comes 3rd in the poll, a bunch of people will want to know what the hell this SoW:BoB thing is anyway, and who knows, perhaps a few of them will even buy it. Does that offend you so much?

Last edited by TheGrunch; 12-21-2009 at 06:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-21-2009, 03:33 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

Tanner,


You are right, we flight simmers are idealists who still believe that better ideas and passion can beat the brute force of big budgets … but as you know this is delusory, and it did never happen in the real world …

Regards,
Insuber
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-21-2009, 04:10 PM
trO trO is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8
Default

Voted & it was in 3rd place....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.