Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2009, 09:16 AM
Xilon_x's Avatar
Xilon_x Xilon_x is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 715
Default

ciao Oleg Maddox i loock the ship explosion and dammage is very good and i was fascinated by the model of pilots good very good.
Oleg Maddox in il-2 sturmovik when the ship is attaked from airplanes is possible destroy it whit bomb or torpedo but if you use the cannon or machine gun ship not destroyed and not dammage the realty is different. When airplane use the gun create the dammage to ship and kill the marines man and dammage the structure is possible create this in BOB?

another question remember my post for the PIAGGIO p108 http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...t=6909&page=25

the BOB is battle of brittain and if you developed this PIAGGIO p108 is included in the hystory of BOB remember BOB not mediterrain or battle of atlantic or pacific scenary you developed only BOB and you create all SHIP AIRPLANE and OBJECT stay in hisotry or BOB after you if you want create expansion mediterrain or pacific or other ecc.ec.after i put another photo piaggio p108.

OLEG MADDOX i loock the pilot modelling is very very good fantastic GERMAN PILOT & ENGLAND PILOT and ITALIAN PILOT? ok i put this photo of italian pilot in battle of brittain.


Italian Cr.42 pilot captured during the Battle of Britain.
http://surfcity.kund.dalnet.se/falco_bob.htm







a i remember the pilots not bare hands but use gloves.

Last edited by Xilon_x; 12-07-2009 at 10:10 AM.
  #2  
Old 12-07-2009, 01:56 PM
Ernst Ernst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 285
Default

Hello! Trying to find some discussion about engine startup in the forum, but i could not find it! You guys known about it? If anyone could redirect me to it i would appreciate!

Engine startup in SoW ll be like IL2 or we can expect more complex management, an engine checklist for example? Like Black Shark!
  #3  
Old 12-07-2009, 02:46 PM
ECV56_Lancelot ECV56_Lancelot is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Argentina
Posts: 225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernst View Post
Hello! Trying to find some discussion about engine startup in the forum, but i could not find it! You guys known about it? If anyone could redirect me to it i would appreciate!

Engine startup in SoW ll be like IL2 or we can expect more complex management, an engine checklist for example? Like Black Shark!
I don´t know if start up will be a little more complex that IL-2 or will be equal, but surely they will not be like Black Shark. It was already stated several times by Oleg, too many cockpits and very long procedures to make real start up, when most people will not use it.
  #4  
Old 12-07-2009, 06:21 PM
Ernst Ernst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 285
Default

Well, i ll use it and a bunch of enthusiasts too. Look realistic p-39 start up:









When i saw movies and manuals like that i think that sims can add much more realistic features.

Last edited by Ernst; 12-07-2009 at 06:57 PM.
  #5  
Old 12-08-2009, 01:39 AM
tagTaken2's Avatar
tagTaken2 tagTaken2 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernst View Post
Well, i ll use it and a bunch of enthusiasts too. Look realistic p-39 start up:
etc...
When i saw movies and manuals like that i think that sims can add much more realistic features.
BS is ONE, painstakingly detailed, aircraft. Writing full startup procedures for all of the aircraft that will eventually be in SoW series? Are you willing to pay $50+ for every single one? And just how many enthusiasts are you including? Oleg said it correctly, even if option to do full startup sequence (including warmup, etc) was available, almost nobody would do it every single time.
If you enjoy sequences, try:
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Flig...0236281&sr=1-1
If, like the rest of us, you prefer combat to checklists, then hush.
  #6  
Old 12-08-2009, 02:25 AM
nearmiss nearmiss is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Default

Falcon 4.0 has all the startup and detail of actual flight to stimulate those wanting to spend more time to feel immersive.
I find it interesting how many Falcon 4.0 enthusiasts set the startup sequences using a single programmable controller function. LOL

I gave up on flight simulators, because flying with charts through all the complexities just doesn't make for ongoing entertainment.

The old warbirds from WW2 are great because they are fast, the munitions are awesome enough and the detail is just about all you need for enjoyment of air combat.

About all I'd like is ADF or some type of navigation for the player that is not dependent upon waypoints 100% of the time. I just hate have to click on the map to fly through the center of a waypoint to advance properly in the mission.

We have more than enough detail with CEM as it is now.

Next thing you know they'll be asking for trim on a slider.
  #7  
Old 12-08-2009, 02:40 AM
Ernst Ernst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tagTaken2 View Post
BS is ONE, painstakingly detailed, aircraft. Writing full startup procedures for all of the aircraft that will eventually be in SoW series? Are you willing to pay $50+ for every single one? And just how many enthusiasts are you including? Oleg said it correctly, even if option to do full startup sequence (including warmup, etc) was available, almost nobody would do it every single time.
If you enjoy sequences, try:
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Flig...0236281&sr=1-1
If, like the rest of us, you prefer combat to checklists, then hush.
I understand how it is difficult to develop complex engine start ups to ever single plane. However it is possible to develop some tools to 3rd parties who decides to develop this kind o features. If i like to much an aircraft i see no problem to pay some "greens" to experience an improved management version of it. This way, i see no problem if Oleg decides to do like they did in RoF and releases some new planes by some few dollars.

I like combat, but other aspects are important too. You talked about FSX, but there i cant put some holes in another aircraft... And some say that IL2 physics is a step ahead.

Last edited by Ernst; 12-08-2009 at 02:53 AM.
  #8  
Old 12-09-2009, 09:43 AM
Xilon_x's Avatar
Xilon_x Xilon_x is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 715
Default

Ciao Oleg Maddox ok now please read this document whit original photo and original Machine gun mounted over italian plane and also the Piaggio P.108.
BREDA S.A.F.A.T. and tracher bullet.
http://www.ww2incolor.com/forum/showthread.php?t=8296

This is Piaggio P.108 complex gun tourett


please Oleg Maddox loock this photo is the Piaggio 108.P tourett and machine gun the tourett of piaggio is expecial fac-simile to SOVIETIC BOMBER PE8 loock this http://www.aereimilitari.org/forum/i...t=#entry227045
tank you OLEG MADDOX see you later.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.