Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-24-2009, 05:08 AM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lost cause View Post
You guys are a trip! But you're all wrong. Yak? Awful!!!!! The cats are pretty good. Butcher Birds is great if it was a real name. But the best is:

Kingcobra! Damn good airplane. Too bad it's not in the game!
Yeah, it's a good plane to get chewed up by my A6M2-21 Zero! lol. Maybe even my "Oscar"? Either way, I wouldn't be caught dead in one of those death traps. Which they were since they had doors!! rather a proper canopy. Nice looking plane though.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-24-2009, 05:39 AM
Voyager's Avatar
Voyager Voyager is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 164
Default

A-20 Havoc.

Cry Havoc! And let slip the dogs of war.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2009, 05:54 AM
Roboslob Roboslob is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post
Which they were since they had doors!! rather a proper canopy.
This is your door speaking, if you can get me open, say hi to the tail fin for me.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-24-2009, 06:00 AM
mattmanB182 mattmanB182 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post
Yeah, it's a good plane to get chewed up by my A6M2-21 Zero! lol. Maybe even my "Oscar"? Either way, I wouldn't be caught dead in one of those death traps. Which they were since they had doors!! rather a proper canopy. Nice looking plane though.
Actually, I could be wrong, but I believe their biggest problem was the lack of a supercharger. I think the performance would have been much better with one. The engine was the biggest problem.

The armament was definatly not too shabby, definatly better than any Yak
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-24-2009, 06:05 AM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboslob View Post
This is your door speaking, if you can get me open, say hi to the tail fin for me.
Exactly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattmanB182 View Post
Actually, I could be wrong, but I believe their biggest problem was the lack of a supercharger. I think the performance would have been much better with one. The engine was the biggest problem.

The armament was definatly not too shabby, definatly better than any Yak
Better armament, doesn't mean a better plane. The Yak-3 was much lighter due to just have twin MGs and a single cannon. While the P-63 Kingcobra, had four MGs and a nose cannon which weighed it down significantly. My Yak-3 could take care of the Kingcobra anyday.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-24-2009, 01:00 PM
PantherAttack2 PantherAttack2 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 252
Default

F-104 Starfighter.

Sure, it's after WW2, but I still think it's pretty cool name for a plane. I guess it can be a bit cheesy though...

I still love those early jets.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-24-2009, 01:54 PM
FOZ_1983 FOZ_1983 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Blackpool, England
Posts: 1,997
Default

wow, some pretty good choices in here guys, i liking it
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-24-2009, 02:52 PM
mattd27 mattd27 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 402
Default

What about the B-36 peacemaker (was that used in WWII?)? If they had that plane drop the nuke there would have been some big controversy about the name.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-24-2009, 04:12 PM
lost cause
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hans Marsielle was killed when bailing out of his 109 by hitting the verticle fin. You didn't have to open the door, the whole thing came off. And there were two, one on each side. Bailing of ANY fighter is risky and dangereous. If your canopy is jammed, you're dead. Two doors are better than one canopy. You guys should do more homework on the Kingcobra. Certain models DID have a supercharger and it had performance on par with the Mustang. It was an entirely differnt plane from the p39. The only reason the USAAF didn't order it was because they had already decided to go with the Mustang. The cobra showed up a few months too late. I have seen this plane many times in Midland Texas at the Confederate Air Force airshow right on the ass of Spits Mustangs, Corsairs, Bearcats and the like. It was a 400+mph fighter in level flight. The Russians got no supercharger because they needed it for low altitudes and they didn't want to pay for it. Unfortunately, we'll never know how good it could have been. We were talking about cool names. Not which of you kick another planes' ass.

Speaking of cool names, the Phantom is another favorite.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-24-2009, 05:44 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattd27 View Post
What about the B-36 peacemaker (was that used in WWII?)? If they had that plane drop the nuke there would have been some big controversy about the name.
Nope. The B-36 was introduced in 1949, and was to replace the B-29 in long range bombing missions. It was originally flow in 1946, a year after WW2 (obviously).

The B-47 Stratojet,That's a cool name.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.