Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2009, 04:50 AM
Pubestien13 Pubestien13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The U.S. of F@#$ing A. America thats where!!! Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 18
Default

In real life I have no problem with most WW2 russian aircraft like a said before. It sickens me that planes that are suppused to out monuever other planes can't because somebody forgot to carry the 1 over in the programing. Again realistic is fine. For example I just finnished a realistic match and a player with a spitfire out monuevered my 109 in a turn a few times.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2009, 04:54 AM
Pubestien13 Pubestien13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The U.S. of F@#$ing A. America thats where!!! Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 18
Default

Yes, I did mean the Mig-29 fulcrum. And that was my question when I figured that out Swagger. It makes sense that they can't afford them because of the soviet fall, but they're supposed to be on an ecconomic rise to certain extent and assuming that thats still accurate they should be able to afford them now.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2009, 04:59 AM
Pubestien13 Pubestien13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The U.S. of F@#$ing A. America thats where!!! Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 18
Default

You can't really compare the F-22 to anything because its a new stage in evolution of the fighter. For all the money and complicated systems in the
F22 it pays off. On several ocasion's while testing, the F-22 went up against 5-1, 7-1, 10-1 engagements and has come out on top. So your getting your moneys worth.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2009, 05:04 AM
Pubestien13 Pubestien13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The U.S. of F@#$ing A. America thats where!!! Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 18
Default

And if you want to engage the F-22 on an even plain you'll most likely need an equal capable, expensive, and advanced plane.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2009, 05:11 AM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pubestien13 View Post
You can't really compare the F-22 to anything because its a new stage in evolution of the fighter. For all the money and complicated systems in the
F22 it pays off. On several ocasion's while testing, the F-22 went up against 5-1, 7-1, 10-1 engagements and has come out on top. So your getting your moneys worth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pubestien13 View Post
And if you want to engage the F-22 on an even plain you'll most likely need an equal capable, expensive, and advanced plane.
To answer both of those, the Su-37 is the Russian answer to the American F-22. So the comparison is reasonable.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2009, 11:38 AM
FOZ_1983 FOZ_1983 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Blackpool, England
Posts: 1,997
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pubestien13 View Post
In real life I have no problem with most WW2 russian aircraft like a said before. It sickens me that planes that are suppused to out monuever other planes can't because somebody forgot to carry the 1 over in the programing. Again realistic is fine. For example I just finnished a realistic match and a player with a spitfire out monuevered my 109 in a turn a few times.

your playing arcade. Enough said.

Arcade doesnt take all these things into consideration, its the easy dificulty that just lets you all fly around shooting each other. You have openly admitted that on realistic things performed differently, such as your 109 getting out turned etc by a spitfire. If you ant things to be how they should (or as close to) then play realistic and not arcade (or play sim even more hardcore )

Its when you go into realistic and you get your ass handed to you by the guy in the other plane that all this knowledge will help you!! next time your enemy takes a spit.... try the yak or the La..... then see him try to out turn you.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2009, 09:54 PM
Pubestien13 Pubestien13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The U.S. of F@#$ing A. America thats where!!! Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 18
Default

hhhhhhhhhh... its getting old doing this circle talk. Realistic mode isn't fun half the time because you have to more worry about not stalling and spinning out of control with no chance of recover. And yes I have adjusted my sesitvity and it does help. I don't see how my knowledge of choosing a plane to use that I know that I have a disavantage with qualifies as getting my "ass handed to me", while trying to get acheive more wins to unlock the Bf-109 G-10.

And I still find it hard to beleive that the Su-37 is on an even plain with the
F-22. So far to my knowledge the only thing they have in common is thrust vectoring technology.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-29-2009, 09:55 PM
Pubestien13 Pubestien13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The U.S. of F@#$ing A. America thats where!!! Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 18
Default

Although it would be a good match.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-30-2009, 01:28 AM
Dubbedinenglish Dubbedinenglish is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pubestien13 View Post
Although it would be a good match.
Far from it, the 37 would be flying around until a missile impacted it.

The F-22 is stealth, the 37 is not.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-30-2009, 02:47 AM
BadByte BadByte is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubbedinenglish View Post

The F-22 is stealth, the 37 is not.
Meh whats the point?, they're both "last generation" next is unmanned aircraft which are cheaper, lower price, lower maintance. I would like to see either one of them try a 1 on X "how many unmanned one could buy for the price of one (1) f22/su37" and then see who wins.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.