Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:18 PM
Wissam24 Wissam24 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Posts: 283
Default

Yeah, I mean lets face it, all those Aces who only got 5 or 6 kills. They ALL suck compared to Erich Hartmann. Man. Every pilot ever sucks, cause he got all those kills.

Just cause another plane did very well doesn't mean another plane didn't. The Wright Brother's plane only flew 200 odd feet, you going to say that had a negligible impact on aviation?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:28 PM
Ancient Seraph Ancient Seraph is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dutchman in Spain
Posts: 788
Default

I repeat, why would a plane be in a game if it has such a negative impact on it, just because it was important for later development? I acknowledge the fact that it had a big impact, but only on development after the war.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:35 PM
Wissam24 Wissam24 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Posts: 283
Default

The Blenheim was proven poor pretty quickly, that's still in there. The Po-2 was a trainer and reconnaissance plane, that's in there. The MC202 only fought in Italy! And it was pretty quickly overwhelmed. Why are they all in there? Because they WERE there
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:37 PM
Ancient Seraph Ancient Seraph is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dutchman in Spain
Posts: 788
Default

So was the Tallboy bomb, wanna bet it won't be there if a Lancaster comes available?
None of the planes stated above have any negative impact on the game, thus you argument is void.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:41 PM
akuma akuma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancient Seraph View Post
So was the Tallboy bomb, wanna bet it won't be there if a Lancaster comes available?
None of the planes stated above have any negative impact on the game, thus you argument is void.
The more the merrier I say. I'd be more than happy to include all the fighters and bombers if it were up to me. But alas its not

However to miss out such high profile aircraft would have been a mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:48 PM
Ancient Seraph Ancient Seraph is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dutchman in Spain
Posts: 788
Default

Wow, you really care about actually playing a fair game, do you?
I appreciate you want realism, and you play on Simulator, right? And in principle I am not against jets being in the game, I'm against them being in multiplayer as a normal option. In 1946 for example, there were a lot of jets, but the host had the ability to select the planes available in the server. There were hardly any good servers that mixed piston with jet. Practically all of the servers were piston-only, and there were some jet-only servers.
I have no problems with jets whatsoever, as long as they're not in a server I want to play in.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:52 PM
Wissam24 Wissam24 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Posts: 283
Default

But that's a game problem that needs to be dealt with, something for the devs, that's nothing to do with how the planes did in history.

And yes, I play on Sim as much as I can. And hardly anyone takes the jets in Sim, because they're absurdly hard to use in that mode.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:52 PM
dazz1971 dazz1971 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: planet earth
Posts: 455
Default

sorry but at the end of the day the jets are in the game they are a valid choice for ppl to use they dont unbalance the game any more than the b17 does and i dont think they have such a negative effect on the game...
just what are you suggesting? that becuse a few ppl decide to fly a jet everyone is going to stop playing ?? i dont think so

and who are you or anyone else for that matter to tell them they are cheating or spoiling the game by doing so ???
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:57 PM
Ancient Seraph Ancient Seraph is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dutchman in Spain
Posts: 788
Default

I would love an option to turn jets on or off. Simple as that.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:44 PM
Wissam24 Wissam24 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Posts: 283
Default

That wasn't your argument, I had said that to leave them out entirely would be wrong, because they were important in the war. You then said that no, they were useless in the war, to which I pointed out that actually, they weren't ALL useless at all. Whether they have a negative impact on the game is irrelevant as regards what we were arguing about. You seemed to be arguing that because they had hardly any impact on the war, they should be left out.

How they affect the game is something that needs to be dealt with, but is not something to do with history
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.