![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, I mean lets face it, all those Aces who only got 5 or 6 kills. They ALL suck compared to Erich Hartmann. Man. Every pilot ever sucks, cause he got all those kills.
Just cause another plane did very well doesn't mean another plane didn't. The Wright Brother's plane only flew 200 odd feet, you going to say that had a negligible impact on aviation? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I repeat, why would a plane be in a game if it has such a negative impact on it, just because it was important for later development? I acknowledge the fact that it had a big impact, but only on development after the war.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Blenheim was proven poor pretty quickly, that's still in there. The Po-2 was a trainer and reconnaissance plane, that's in there. The MC202 only fought in Italy! And it was pretty quickly overwhelmed. Why are they all in there? Because they WERE there
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
So was the Tallboy bomb, wanna bet it won't be there if a Lancaster comes available?
None of the planes stated above have any negative impact on the game, thus you argument is void. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
However to miss out such high profile aircraft would have been a mistake. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow, you really care about actually playing a fair game, do you?
I appreciate you want realism, and you play on Simulator, right? And in principle I am not against jets being in the game, I'm against them being in multiplayer as a normal option. In 1946 for example, there were a lot of jets, but the host had the ability to select the planes available in the server. There were hardly any good servers that mixed piston with jet. Practically all of the servers were piston-only, and there were some jet-only servers. I have no problems with jets whatsoever, as long as they're not in a server I want to play in. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
But that's a game problem that needs to be dealt with, something for the devs, that's nothing to do with how the planes did in history.
And yes, I play on Sim as much as I can. And hardly anyone takes the jets in Sim, because they're absurdly hard to use in that mode. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
sorry but at the end of the day the jets are in the game they are a valid choice for ppl to use they dont unbalance the game any more than the b17 does and i dont think they have such a negative effect on the game...
just what are you suggesting? that becuse a few ppl decide to fly a jet everyone is going to stop playing ?? i dont think so and who are you or anyone else for that matter to tell them they are cheating or spoiling the game by doing so ??? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would love an option to turn jets on or off. Simple as that.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
That wasn't your argument, I had said that to leave them out entirely would be wrong, because they were important in the war. You then said that no, they were useless in the war, to which I pointed out that actually, they weren't ALL useless at all. Whether they have a negative impact on the game is irrelevant as regards what we were arguing about. You seemed to be arguing that because they had hardly any impact on the war, they should be left out.
How they affect the game is something that needs to be dealt with, but is not something to do with history |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|