Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2009, 08:08 PM
Ancient Seraph Ancient Seraph is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dutchman in Spain
Posts: 788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riceball View Post
If I was the designer of a fighter, that would be the #1 problem to solve.
I think my #1 would be out-manouvring every other plane out there. It would be more usefull to be able to get on someone's six and then have to burst carefully then to have no recoil at all, but the turning radius of a B17.
Problem with designing an aircraft is that there are a lot of factors involved, and I think I'd put recoil relatively low on the list.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-20-2009, 03:27 AM
Riceball Riceball is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Iowa City, IA. USA
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancient Seraph View Post
I think my #1 would be out-manouvring every other plane out there. It would be more usefull to be able to get on someone's six and then have to burst carefully then to have no recoil at all, but the turning radius of a B17.
Problem with designing an aircraft is that there are a lot of factors involved, and I think I'd put recoil relatively low on the list.
I think you took that sentence a little too literally.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2009, 03:46 AM
mattd27 mattd27 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 402
Default

IMO the Yak-9 has some of the worst recoil in BoP. You've got to be sure you have the perfect shot first, or you'll get your aim thrown way off.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-20-2009, 01:51 PM
PantherAttack2 PantherAttack2 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattd27 View Post
IMO the Yak-9 has some of the worst recoil in BoP. You've got to be sure you have the perfect shot first, or you'll get your aim thrown way off.
Yeah... I can't believe how horrible it's recoil is. It's practically useless unless you are a perfect shot.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-20-2009, 02:56 PM
Riceball Riceball is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Iowa City, IA. USA
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PantherAttack2 View Post
Yeah... I can't believe how horrible it's recoil is. It's practically useless unless you are a perfect shot.
That's what I mean. You would think there would be an easy way to solve that.

Say a plane has four MGs. You set guns 1$3 to fire at the same time. And 2&4 fire at the same time. Problem solved. No?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-20-2009, 03:33 PM
Ancient Seraph Ancient Seraph is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dutchman in Spain
Posts: 788
Default

The Yak 9T only had 1 huge cannon right? Maybe the added machine gun was a failed attempt to make it compensate for the recoil
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-20-2009, 03:48 PM
MorgothNL MorgothNL is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riceball View Post
That's what I mean. You would think there would be an easy way to solve that.

Say a plane has four MGs. You set guns 1$3 to fire at the same time. And 2&4 fire at the same time. Problem solved. No?
thats what they did with for example the P-51 and the hurricane

But the Yak-9T was more intended to use its cannon at ground targets. It didnt need the 0 recoil to get a perfect burst at a turning plane.
It needed to be able to fire a few rounds in a tank, that it can do ..
But yeah, to kill a tank, you need a big round, thus giving a lot of recoil. But since it didnt need 0 recoil for its goal... why bother fixing it

Besides, the big cannon is in the nose, you cant really compensate for that.
A gun in the left wing can be compensated by a gun in the right wing, the cannon of the yak is in the middle, what were they supposed to do
what is the easy way to solve that?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-20-2009, 03:56 PM
Riceball Riceball is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Iowa City, IA. USA
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MorgothNL View Post
thats what they did with for example the P-51 and the hurricane

But the Yak-9T was more intended to use its cannon at ground targets. It didnt need the 0 recoil to get a perfect burst at a turning plane.
It needed to be able to fire a few rounds in a tank, that it can do ..
But yeah, to kill a tank, you need a big round, thus giving a lot of recoil. But since it didnt need 0 recoil for its goal... why bother fixing it

Besides, the big cannon is in the nose, you cant really compensate for that.
A gun in the left wing can be compensated by a gun in the right wing, the cannon of the yak is in the middle, what were they supposed to do
what is the easy way to solve that?
Ask the designers of the A-10. Thing has a 12 foot gatling gun in it's nose.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-20-2009, 04:15 PM
Ancient Seraph Ancient Seraph is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dutchman in Spain
Posts: 788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MorgothNL View Post
Besides, the big cannon is in the nose, you cant really compensate for that.
A gun in the left wing can be compensated by a gun in the right wing, the cannon of the yak is in the middle, what were they supposed to do
what is the easy way to solve that?
Sarcasm my friend .

I do believe however that when strafing a tiny tank you wouldn't want to much recoil either.. in any case, it would be wise to burst .
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.