Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-17-2009, 07:22 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David603 View Post
Yeah, I agree a Yak-3 pilot probably won't want to challenge a D9 to a duel, but given the D9s speed advantage he might not have the choice. Really these are two planes that have a very strong orientation towards different styles of fighting, if either tries to play the others game they will be outclassed.

The Yak-3's problem here is that the faster, quicker climbing plane in any confrontation gets to choose which game both will play. That's why I love flying planes like the 109K and Spitfire XIV myself.
That's true to a sense, but just look at the Zero and the way they fought. They were light, fast, and maneuverable, but they chewed the American Wildcats, and P-40s up because of their low and quick tactics. I think it just depends on the situation really?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-17-2009, 07:38 PM
David603 David603 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 6'clock high
Posts: 713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post
That's true to a sense, but just look at the Zero and the way they fought. They were light, fast, and maneuverable, but they chewed the American Wildcats, and P-40s up because of their low and quick tactics. I think it just depends on the situation really?
Zero Vs Wildcat is biased pretty heavily in the Zero's favour, not only are they more manoeuvrable but they are faster and climb better. Zero Vs P40 is another matter, because while the Zero is still more agile and climbs better, the P40 does have a speed advantage, and combined with the P40s better high speed handling it gives the P40 an edge the P40 pilot can exploit over the Zero.

I suppose it does depend on the situation, but with a Yak-3 vs a Fw190D9 the 190 pilot is the one who decides the situation, and he would be stupid to pick the situation that favours the Yak-3.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-17-2009, 07:40 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David603 View Post
Zero Vs Wildcat is biased pretty heavily in the Zero's favour, not only are they more manoeuvrable but they are faster and climb better. Zero Vs P40 is another matter, because while the Zero is still more agile and climbs better, the P40 does have a speed advantage, and combined with the P40s better high speed handling it gives the P40 an edge the P40 pilot can exploit over the Zero.

I suppose it does depend on the situation, but with a Yak-3 vs a Fw190D9 the 190 pilot is the one who decides the situation, and he would be stupid to pick the situation that favoured the Yak-3.
I dunno, I think a GM built FM2 Wilcat would be better, since they were A LOT better than the F4F series. But anyway, it just depends on the situation, and who gets the jump on who first?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-17-2009, 07:51 PM
David603 David603 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 6'clock high
Posts: 713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post
I dunno, I think a GM built FM2 Wilcat would be better, since they were A LOT better than the F4F series. But anyway, it just depends on the situation, and who gets the jump on who first?
Yeah, the FM series of Wildcat is an improvement over the older models, but the A6M5 is at least as big an improvement over the A6M2, so given the choice I would rather be flying a Hellcat or Corsair against Zeros.

Anyway, while it is quite possible the Yak-3 pilot could get the jump on the D9, all other factors being equal the plane that flies higher and faster is more likely to be the one that jumps the other or at least enters combat with an energy advantage.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2009, 07:58 PM
Tentacle19 Tentacle19 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 14
Default

Regarding the D-9 in real life:

"Kurt Tank had designed this model to operate as a high altitude fighter but the cabin design was unable to provide adequate pressurization. The aircraft was used to replace The FW 190A at lower altitudes and coincidentally was sometimes humorously referred to as “Downstairs Dora” or “Maid”."

A great plane that while achieving parity with allied fighters suffered heavy losses ( no experienced pilots left ). None the less it is still my favorite german fighter looks wise.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.