Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp
That is a good point. We are talking about the test pilots who felt the Bf-109 was "embarrassed" by the slats opening in the turn.
I would not be surprised if the pilots did not operate the propeller at its most efficient point at the single data point the RAE used. That would throw off all of Gates assumption for the entire envelope.
In order to reproduce the RAE results, I have to drop the propeller efficiency to below average and assume VDM could not properly design a propeller.
|
As it happens yes they are. The UK had the first and at that time only test pilot training school in the world. As for being embarrased yes the Me109E was embarased by the way the slots opened, which no doubt was why they were redesigned for the Me109F. Unless you have a better reason for the redesign.
As for you having to drop the propeller efficiency to get the same results, working on the basis that you are not a trained test pilot then I can only assume that your model is wrong. I know you believe that the test pilots are not important but if I had to pick between their hard earned experience and training, backed up be the science of the day and access to the real aircraft, against your maths and how you read documents, I would go for the experts.
09-20-2012, 07:08 PM
Threaded Mode