Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles
IMO, the difference between a MkII and a MkV is much less than the difference between a 109F and a 109G.
My understanding is that a MkV is basically just a MkI but with a Merlin 45. True?
.
|
It's essentially a MK I airframe, yes. There are differences though.
The airframes were strengthened (I must admit I don't know what this involved)
The radiator scoop under the wing is bigger, and there was a difference in weight .
MK V's had the inertia weight fitted into the elevator system as well. There's also a difference between early V's and late V's, they got heavier as more mods were added.
It's all a bit confusing, I've got Crumpp saying that the stall is horrid and yet I've got a NACA report on the Spitfire stall that says that it has the best stall characteristics of any fighter they had tested and that they were 'desirable'
The other problem I have with this whole argument is that there is no data for the same tests on any of the other a/c in the game (AFAIK). How many WW2 aircraft would have also been considered unstable by NACA?
07-19-2012, 12:34 AM
Threaded Mode