Cliffs of Dover, a Year Later

[taildraggernut]

Whether you like it or not, all that Flastaff was doing was showing that David can be horrible (with intent) and Chivas acts as though he has some inside-knowledge which transcends anyone else's. It's not a case of logic: it's guesswork behind the facade of fact.

All that Falstaff was doing was pointless, nobody needs anybody else here to shows us how people behave, were all quite capable of seeing things for ourselves, when it comes to 'glass houses' even you have some shaky ground to stand on, I have seen you be less than pleasant to other forum users.