![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
First and foremost the simulation market will probably disappear before anything like this even has the slightest chance of succeeding seeing as it's such a niche within a niche you'd have to look for a game like Call of Duty to find something like this attempted. And we've yet to see a Call of Duty with pay-per month have we? Please go ahead and round up all the games that have migrated from a firm model into a pay-per-month milking model at a later stage? Paranoia is all there is too it, nothing more nothing less and as stated the developers should take every precaution they can to protect their game / property. If it comes down to a Monthly fee with future games, then you can make up your own mind at the time and just not pay, I for once wouldn't pay for a fps or simulation per month, if the time comes you show this by not buying and using their products at that time. Argumentation against DRM / Protection today is just a bunch of paranoia, nothing suggests that SOW or 1C will pursuit a model that is based around a monthly payment. I feel its kinda equivalent to the current society paranoia that there are cameras everywhere and that the government controls your private life within a 10 year period... pathetic. However if a model like this would be attempted they would have to come up with something tempting for the customers such as major support, constant updates of content, patches similar to an MMO, which in the end many people might be completely fine with, if we get enough support , extra content constantly along with community features. Nothing i personally would like but their not just gonna pop up with a new business model tomorrow and magically hope for customers to accept it. Last edited by zauii; 06-09-2010 at 07:29 AM. |
|
|