Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-08-2011, 11:12 AM
RickRuski RickRuski is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Auckland New Zealand
Posts: 462
Thumbs up This sim is flyable with a "Low Specs PC"

I have just received my C.O.D through the mail in the last couple of days and have spent not a lot of time experimenting with settings but have it flyable. This gives me a lot of encoragement to be patient and let the guys and gals at 1C do their stuff. Here are my pc specs: -

E6600 Core 2 Duo 2.4 gig
6gig ram
550w p/s
9600gt 1gig ram
2x HDD (1 x 1Tb--1 x 320gig) both are partitioned

C.O.D is installed on drive "I" a dedicated "Steam" drive of 200g (this is the only instal in that drive)

I am getting fps over water of 30--35 fps and over land 20--25 fps.

Here are my video settings: -

AA= off
Model details=high
Blds=medium
Land=Medium
Forest=Medium
Visual=High
Texture=High
Damage=Medium
Bld. amount=Low
Shading=Medium

Grass=off
Shadows=off
Roads=on

Some of you are going to say why don't you upgrade your pc (basically it is too expensive in NZ to up grade to a top end pc, probably about $3000-00NZD. I hope to do slower changes and upgrades as the game gets optimised).

This post is to give encouragement to people like myself not to give up on this sim, try some tweeking of your own. looking at a lot of moans from many it nearly put me off buying this, but I'm glad I have. Lets be more patient and let the people at 1c bring this sim to its full potential. I seem to remember when R.O.F was first released there were similar cries of dispair, but after some time of optomizing it is now regarded as amazing graphically.

Last edited by RickRuski; 05-08-2011 at 07:57 PM. Reason: spelling mistake
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-08-2011, 11:39 AM
RE77ACTION RE77ACTION is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 121
Default

You could even get an extra FPS by setting your model detail to medium. It makes the 'wire frame' of the planes less complex and thus visually less smooth. But I personally find the degradation of graphics minor. I even think I like it better because model detail on high makes the planes too 'plastic' for my taste. But hey, probably lots will disagree...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-08-2011, 08:10 PM
RickRuski RickRuski is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Auckland New Zealand
Posts: 462
Default

Thanks for that RE77, tried that but it made no difference to fps. Will keep trying diferent settings to get the best I can. looking forward to the next patch, hoping there will be some more optimization. One of the biggest killers to fps that I have found on my system is clouds, have that turned off except when flyng channel missions.

Last edited by RickRuski; 05-08-2011 at 08:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-08-2011, 08:46 PM
Buchon Buchon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 437
Default

Interesting to everyone to know is under what resolution are you running IL2COD on that system.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-08-2011, 10:49 PM
RE77ACTION RE77ACTION is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 121
Default

Model detail medium vs high gave me about 5% extra FPS in the Black Death track. And because I don't mind the difference in graphical quality, it's a good tradeoff for me. The difference should be most noticeable when dog fighting with lots of planes. And in these situation it's nice to have the game as smooth as possible.

According to the CloD manual, model detail has a strong influence on performance. I personally think that clouds and shadows have the biggest impact. In your case, these are (mostly) off already.

Today I've tried the beta patch (ver 1.00.14413). I think it could possibly improve performance for most people. So now and then the frame rate is fractionally lower than before but on the other hand higher above big cities. Most important is that it runs MUCH smoother. The look and feel of the game have improved a great deal (more than the frame rate would suggest).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-08-2011, 11:23 PM
Sokol1's Avatar
Sokol1 Sokol1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 727
Default

Quote:
Bld. amount=Low
You test in Unlimited?

In my low end system (C2D@2.6Gha/4Ram/Gf250GTS1Gb) @ 1200x1024(60Hz)
I don see negative difference in performance using Unlimited, and building pop-up is low.

Sokol1
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-09-2011, 09:34 AM
Rickusty Rickusty is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rome, Total Wa... ehm, Italy
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesehawk View Post
I have almost the same system as you, without the 1TB drive (2x 320GB)and a 9800GT 1GB.

I'm running 1680x1050 Vsync on, AA on, with only Models and Damage on high, rest low or very low, and I'm getting around the same performance FPS wise. Get the latest beta patch, it might have killed multiplayer, but it improved my single player a good bit.
Same here. Very good FPS all around.
CDE7500
4 gb RAM ddr2800
GTS450

Multiplayer has become unplayable though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-10-2011, 07:37 AM
RickRuski RickRuski is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Auckland New Zealand
Posts: 462
Default

Have just found about a 5fps rise with one little change. When you launch your mission with cockpit "on" you can see most of your dash board, in the bf109 though the gunsight reticile is off set. Hit "Shift-F1" not only will it give the 109 reticile centre but also about 5fps increase (at least it does with my system) with all cockpit views.

Don't know if anyone else has found this, it certainly helps with a low specs pc flyability.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-11-2011, 07:29 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Why should we lie? If it works it works, if it doesn't then it doesn't.

Maybe we should try a fund raising and buy you airline tickets to come visit some of us and see it for yourself
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-11-2011, 09:07 PM
RickRuski RickRuski is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Auckland New Zealand
Posts: 462
Default

have found a few more fps by altering some graphics settings, here are my latest: -

Mod Details--high
Buildings---Medium
Land---Medium
Forest---Low
Visual Eff---High
Texture---High
Damage---Medium
Building Amount---Low
Shading---Low

Grass=off
Shadows=off
Roads=on

Sorry "omgclod" if you can't get your system working, but some of us with low specs pc have by trying different settings. We have managed to achieve reasonable performance by keeping at it and experimenting. My system is standard (not o/c) and I'm not very savy with altering bios etc (in fact it scares the @%#* out of me even thinking about it). Dont give up, I found that the "beta patch" helped, once the game is more optimised we will wonder what all the fuss was about.
Here's my system specs: -

Asus P5b mb
E6600 core 2 duo 2.4gig
6gig ram 1066 DDR2
9600gt 1 gig vram
1x HDD 1Tb
1x HDD 320g
550w p/s

This basic rig is 5 years old but I have upgraded the ram from 2gig --6gig and added the 1Tb HDD. Both HDD's are partitioned with all my il2 series on drives separate from "C". I have one partition as a special "Steam" drive with only COD on that.

Last edited by RickRuski; 05-12-2011 at 03:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.