Quote:
Originally Posted by Eries
Ok, so there seems to be some confusing and/or conflicting information out there regarding 4.09.
Possibly someone at 1C and/or Daedelus can now step in to provide info or clarify the following:
1. Where is the official announcment from 1C regarding 4.09 ?
2. Where is the official announcment from Daedelus regarding 4.09 ?
3. Where is the official announcment from 1C regarding the content of 4.09 ?
4. Where is the official announcment from Daedelus regarding the content
of 4.09 ?
The estimated release date is another question. That could be provided as a courtesy from either group if they wish but not neccesary.
What I am looking for is official information from the devs so I can avoid reading multiple threads and posts full of speculation and bickering.
If 4.09 is serious at all , or will become serious , then for the sake of being consistent with other software developers there should be some official news releases. The announcements on content may not exactly match the official release when it comes out , but of course , as we see with other software devs , they release as accurate a list as they can as timely as possble leading up to the release date.
If some or all of this information can be provided , then the consumer can judge the validity of this project and determine nearly where the version stands in development. I think with the level of support for il2 and 1C , that a basic courtesy to the loyal customers would be for 1C or Daedelus to state 4.09 is in either one of the following stages:
Pre-Alpha
Alpha
Beta
Release Candidate
RTM
Thanks for your cooperation .
- Eries
|
Since my post has been buried behind immaterial commentary , I am reposting it here as a quote as a courtesy for 1C and Daedelus.
Agian....Please respect that my post is a question for the devs and not a post intended for commentary from users here.
Just as in real life when you are seated at a table where two folks are having a conversation you can hear, its not always appropriate or courteous to begin commenting without an invitation to join , though certainly the ability is there.
To provide a good mechanism for Daedelus and 1C to review and comment on users input , please refrain from burying this post behind commentary on its content. If you have concerns about the content of my posts , please address them via pm to me. This will allow this thread to remain focused on the use it was intended for.
once again , your cooperation is greatly appreciated,
Eries