Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice_Eagle
Statics use an entirely different damage model.
|
Sorry that I wasn't clearer. In my test mission I use the flying models. I just have them start on the ground so that I have a very close range, non-moving target so that there can be no mistakes about what part I hit, how often I hit, and whether a particular gun loses effectiveness at range.
I also use Arcade Mode so I can determine exactly where my bullets hit, and what effect my firing has on AI.
Yes, it's a very artificial test environment, but it's taught me a lot about the IL2 damage model and about how the actual planes were built.
So, I repeat: on the ground, against a flyable FW-190, it is impossible to break that aircraft's wing using .50 caliber BMG. I've tested this something like 25 times now and I always get the same result.
Where I'm obviously wrong is that it appears that IL2 actually does have some mechanism where parts weakened by gunfire can break under G-stress or high speeds. That's very good news indeed.
Now if they just extend that same effect to fires rather than having a "plane explodes" effect set to trigger sometime after the plane is set on fire.