View Single Post
  #30  
Old 07-24-2013, 12:58 AM
horseback horseback is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gaunt1 View Post
Please... Check the ACCELERATION chart made by HORSEBACK. (page 6, post # 44) It clearly shows the insane advantage of the FN over the F. For example, 270 to 500 km/h takes 56 seconds for F, and 36 seconds for FN. Thats 55.5% better performance.
I'd say that it's more like 55.5% better time. The lead one develops through each 10kph interval is added to the next one, and the next, sort of like compounded interest. If you have a power advantage of 20%, it is applied in each interval, and that advantage increases with every subsequent interval.

Acceleration is usually expressed in terms of both time and distance: some many meters per second per second (or per second squared). It is an ongoing process, and the primary limitation is air resistance, or drag, which increases as a cube of the velocity, if I remember correctly. In any case, you need exponentially more power to overcome drag as speed increases, which is why my charts depict curves instead of straight lines.

cheers

horseback
Reply With Quote