Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryKlein
You could also add to the list the Ki 30, Ki 51, G3M, P1Y (or the Helldiver for the USN ) but none of them are easy additions.
By trying to cover the whole war, PF was simply too ambitious from the start.
The question is IMHO : what can DT do with their limited means ? (supposing they want to )
Knowing that no matter how, gaps are inevitable.
Should they keep trying to cover the whole war,
or should they focus on a limited periods in order to get at least something complete for all sides ie : pre, early, mid or late war ?
|
You're right that some specialization might be a good idea. I think, if some sort of Pacific specialization were to occur that they should focus on China/Burma/India and focus on one or two major battles where lots of air power was used and fill in the maps and aircraft types that are missing. It's not actually a lot ... most of the work has been done already but it might fit the more tactical nature of the IL-2 engine better than large island hopping campaigns... although with the Solomons and N-G maps we should have the majority of that covered.