Quote:
Originally Posted by tiberiu
I think you missed the part where That whole thread was about using a MAGE. You keep rambling about Warrior when it's completly off topic. But yes, tactics is for noobs always.
"Supposedly". Yea, right. Figures. /8 player too.. sure.
I never said people are stupid for doing no loss. I do no loss myself. Stop trolling please. I said the contrary, black on white, on my first post in that topic. What I said is that the fact that the game allows such a thing is stupid, and it is. No challange in this game when you kill every unit called "invincible" with no loss by cheap exploits like infinite mana/infinite rage +ressurection combos. From now on you will address me with respect.
Game is not young, game is pre-beta.
|
Actually, I think YOU missed the part that I was the OP of that thread and I was talking about Viking/Warrior. You know the part where I said I'm a level 25 Viking/Warrior and if level 5s were still viable.
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=35778
First 2 guys in the post responded correctly that for Viking/Warriors, level 5s dont' make a lot of sense damage wise.
Someone else started talking about mages and you ran with it. I entertained the idea since no point in kaboshing generally useful information even if it was slightly off topic. What you did say was useful for mages of which I gave you credit for in my previous post. In other words, YOU WERE the one who was off topic.
Well, I like killing bosses in Armored Princess in < 10 rounds with no losses. If you like taking a bit longer, that's cool. Hard to do that without tactics, and if you don't know why, I guess you are too pro to know.
http://diablo.incgamers.com/blog/com...-uber-tristram
Video of solo naked necromancer hell mode. Not sure if it was hardcore as it is too much for me to watch to see if he died. I'm going to guess probably so.
I can't seem to find info on the Diablo 2 solo hardcore necromancer /8 players. Someone bragged about that on the diablo 3 forums and I think he had a reference point somewhere that I can't find right now. Diablo 2 isnt' really that hard, but the ubers are tricky os the iron man ubers is very tricky (iron man meaning you can't revisit old areas and such). Anyway, it has something to do with only stuff points into dexterity.
I'm sure those guys would think you are quite noob in saying hardcore is a "real challenge" as well. Amazing how relativity works.
Quote:
|
But I don't know if I'd go as far to say it is stupid. If you ever do a video game challenge and someone says your works are "stupid", don't be surprised. And if you think all video game challenges are inherently not interesting challenges, from that point of view, why would you bother comparing Diablo 2 challenges to this? Most normal people would insist all video game challenges are stupid.
|
I never said you said people who do no-loss is stupid. I said you said 'it', as in the work or concept or progress of doing so. Unless someone here plays too much King's Bounty and really does look like a big Troll who can regenerate at night...
Per your own title
"The so called "no-loss" concept (whole game) is wrong and stupid."
Not sure I follow your last line about
Quote:
|
From now on you will address me with respect.
|
- You misread my posting claiming the OP was off topic on his own thread which talked about Viking/Warrior.
- Demonstrated you aren't aware of a different strategy (Viking/Warrior build)
- Misquoted/misread that I said you felt the "no loss challenge" was stupid (we never said people were stupid).
- didn't seem to realize people have beaten diablo 2 hardcore naked in some shape or form
I'd hope you can change my view of you in the future, because besides our general agreement that no-loss can be an unnecessarily painful artificial challenge (I'm a pragmatist), you haven't really earned any more of my respect with your current response despite me trying to be as civil and hopefully factual as possible about it.