View Single Post
  #260  
Old 09-20-2012, 08:03 AM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtyphoon View Post
So while Crumpp is prepared to say that maths has all the answers compromises, such as leaving out the pilot and reducing the weight of an aircraft is okay - especially if it favours one type in particular over another.
Uhm, the weight Crumpp used for the Spitfire I doesn't include the weight of armor either. So how this - marginal - weight difference favours one type over the other, Sherlock?

Quote:
"I fixed it and it narrows the gap" but no explanation as to how this was done. Instead we are told to have faith in Crumpp's genius because he knows better than everyone else, as per usual.
I see. Crumpp understands the formulae behind calculating turn radii and time, you do not, and somehow he is to be blamed for your ignorance? Or maybe it is his fault that after your never ceasing personal attacks, he is not particularly inclined to bother to explain it to you?
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote