Let me guess here.
The 'math' (or 'maths' as it's referred to over here) according to Crummp, shows something adverse to the documented real life performance of the Supermarine Spitfire relative to the performance of the Bf109.
There is a distinct pattern developing here.
I find it surprising that a man who purports to concern himself with the performance of 'real aircraft', does not spend his time debating these issues on a more appropriate forum involving comparisons between 'real world' aircraft.
Why would such an expert in his field waste his time on a forum geared to the analysis of a Battle of Britain based computer game? With most of his efforts geared toward the discrediting of the Supermarine Spitfire relative to the Messerschmidt Bf109?
It's a mystery to me, but maybe a psychologist could write a thesis.
|