Quote:
Originally Posted by Madfish
Sorry but... are you kidding?  I thought we all had math at school?
The total number of CloD devs is probably 1/10th of the Crytek management secretaries alone. Crytek is a multi-million AAA game company with offices all around the freaking globe?! They have about 6 studios and almost 40 offices world wide and got way more than 600 employees! (Not counting sub-contractors)
All I can say is you completely lost contact with reality if you really believe a small studio like MG can ever pull something similar off.  |
LOL! Get a grip, I never, at any point, said that they'd have make a game that had to be on the same technical level as Crysis 3, after all, we all had math in school and also learned to read and interpret text there. The point of my post, which you missed sorry if I was unclear English is not my first language, was that any claims by the developers or someone else for that matter that the removal of the non-sandblasted aircraft was due to increase performance is ridiculous. I took the Crysis 3 as an example of a very graphically advanced game which will most likely run very good on peoples PC's around here (you know, the guys with i7's and 680's etc.) whilst a graphically inferior game, CloD in this case, isn't performing very well on same hardware.
Now, as I've stated before, I don't wanna argue with anyone but did so this time because of a misunderstanding.