Quote:
|
when another NACA document on the Spitfire's stall characteristics was presented it was dismissed as being irrelevant:
|
Where do you get this stuff?
Nobody dismissed it as irrelevent. In fact, it agrees with the first NACA report.
Do you think the NACA was contridicting itself?
Did you read the report and note the conditions??
It all agrees, bud. Stop with your pointy tin foil hat theories.