Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlaw
They also don't like people who claim that a free-body-diagram is nonsense because, "...you have to show all the forces in the system...", and then proceed to tell them how to do physics.
--Outlaw.
|
if youre to prove a reactionless engine schauberger style in a free body diagram if for every force you paint you MUST paint an oposite according newton is virtually imposible to break the rules and paint a force WITHOUT the opposite, a reactionless force, since youre breaking the very rules
you know what they werent able to answer in no physics forum?:
if a tube is spining on its transversal axe and theres a projectile inside whats the normal force that projectile experiments?
the right answer is none though its making a curve is the equivalent to free fall in artificial gravity, this very thing takes us to schauberger free energy antigravity turbines
but remember as i wrotten in my exam friction is independent of surface, its the same push ten boxes in a row than piled one on other
have you pondered than thinking questioning people are not wellcome?